Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-11-2013, 08:03 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
3,088 posts, read 5,356,109 times
Reputation: 1626

Advertisements

First of all, most of us "lefties" do not want to ban guns. We want guns to be owned by those who use them appropriately, and with the care and consideration that such weapons deserve. We want to ban assault weapons from those who are not engaged in warfare. . . ..as we believe they have no place in the average home, for hunting or protection. We recognize that we live in a society where there are large numbers of people who suffer from mental health problems that cause them to use "poor judgement" where the use of lethal force is concrned, and who will likely harm either themselves of others if they have easy access to lethal weapons. We recognize that there are certain groups of people in this country who profit financailly from createing fear of others in the general populace, and who use this fear to market as many lethal weapons as they can. We believe that fear based motivation, especially that drummed up by those who see a profit in creating it, can and does cause weapons to be used recklessly and without legitimate need. We want sensible protections against these societal dangers, period. We DO NOT want to take away your weapons used for sporting or subsistance purposes, we do not want you to feel "powerless" in the presence of legitimate enemies, but we would very much like to see you feel confident in yourselves and in sensible measures to provide for and protect your family and loved ones, and believe that that confidence comes not from "fear based" behavior, but from clear thought process and reasonable precaution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-11-2013, 08:04 PM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,569,031 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometclear View Post
How do we weigh one against the other? For instance, how many instances of brandishing a gun to stop a property crime does it take to equal a fatal drive-by shooting?

.
You don't know if the criminal is only after your property. When someone uses violence against you, you can only assume he's after your life otherwise why you would need to pull out your gun to deploy deadly force?

When some law abiding citizen brandishing a gun, a proper assumption is that she or he is reasonably believe that it's a situation of immediate death or greatly bodily harm.

So, one life saved v.s. one life lost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2013, 08:06 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,748,172 times
Reputation: 20674
Q:What is the real reason people want to ban guns?

Who is talking about banning guns?

When you are 79, sitting in a rocker on your front porch, stroking your gun with your shakey hand, will you ponder why you spent so much time and energy,worrying that "they" were coming for your guns?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2013, 08:11 PM
 
Location: Whoville....
25,386 posts, read 35,546,439 times
Reputation: 14692
Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679 View Post
Not when cartels can smuggle in full auto guns.
Criminals will always be able to get what they want no matter what laws we pass. It's really stupid of us to think that passing a law will curtail anything. You'd think we would have learned a lesson from prohibition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2013, 08:13 PM
 
374 posts, read 236,228 times
Reputation: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by cap1717 View Post
First of all, most of us "lefties" do not want to ban guns. We want guns to be owned by those who use them appropriately, and with the care and consideration that such weapons deserve. We want to ban assault weapons from those who are not engaged in warfare. . . ..as we believe they have no place in the average home, for hunting or protection. We recognize that we live in a society where there are large numbers of people who suffer from mental health problems that cause them to use "poor judgement" where the use of lethal force is concrned, and who will likely harm either themselves of others if they have easy access to lethal weapons. We recognize that there are certain groups of people in this country who profit financailly from createing fear of others in the general populace, and who use this fear to market as many lethal weapons as they can. We believe that fear based motivation, especially that drummed up by those who see a profit in creating it, can and does cause weapons to be used recklessly and without legitimate need. We want sensible protections against these societal dangers, period. We DO NOT want to take away your weapons used for sporting or subsistance purposes, we do not want you to feel "powerless" in the presence of legitimate enemies, but we would very much like to see you feel confident in yourselves and in sensible measures to provide for and protect your family and loved ones, and believe that that confidence comes not from "fear based" behavior, but from clear thought process and reasonable precaution.
If you wanted that, you wouldn't be telling us what we can own......UNLESS it's a quality issue.

Bring a Jennings J-22 to a Sig Sauer P-226 9mm fight.....you will lose.

Bring a Tec-9 to a AR-15 A2 fight....you will lose.

No one gives a flying fawk about shooting deer and ducks.

You can do that with a single shot shotgun or crossbow for Christs sake.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2013, 08:13 PM
 
Location: Sinking in the Great Salt Lake
13,138 posts, read 22,818,947 times
Reputation: 14116
Quote:
Originally Posted by cap1717 View Post
First of all, most of us "lefties" do not want to ban guns... We want to ban assault weapons from those who are not engaged in warfare...as we believe they have no place in the average home, for hunting or protection.... We DO NOT want to take away your weapons ...
Not ALL your guns, just your scary black ones, and any gun that can shoot more than 10 rounds at a time. Next year we'll go after semi-auto ones, then your pistols and rifles the year after and then your shotguns. Finally, we expect you to give up your BB guns... before someone shoots their eye out.

ALL GUNS WERE MEANT FOR THE SAME PURPOSE, TO KILL. Far more random crazy shootings have happened with plain old "normal" guns. No anti-gun "leftie" really wants to stop at "Assault Weapons"... they want them all crushed.

...and then only the criminals will have them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2013, 08:15 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,201,197 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post


nope, the only reason for gun control laws is "control". the government seeks to control the people and they know that cannot do so if the people are armed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2013, 08:22 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,264,758 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivorytickler View Post
Criminals will always be able to get what they want no matter what laws we pass. It's really stupid of us to think that passing a law will curtail anything. You'd think we would have learned a lesson from prohibition.
I know and not all laws are bad, but the homicide rate in the US is 4.7-5.2. However, we know that a chunk of black men suffer an endless cycle of social ills and end up contributing to half of the homicide rate. Just imagine if we could cut that rate to 25%, not unreasonable considering we are talking about less than 7% of the US population. If we did that we would be right about where Switzerland and still have room to improve. Instead we say it's the gun, gotta we the gun.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2013, 08:22 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,364,082 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by cap1717 View Post
.We [the left] want to ban assault weapons from those who are not engaged in warfare. . . ..as we believe they have no place in the average home, for hunting or protection...
That is demonstrably not true. I live in the Seattle area; Seattle is as left-wing as any city in the US. Yet the police carry AR-15's and Glock 22's with hi-capacity magazines--both assault weapons, at least according to the bizarre and convoluted definition of Dianne Feinstein's 1994 "assault weapon" ban.

The Seattle city council, as lefty as they come, could have easily turned back the clock and ordered that cops go back to shotguns and revolvers. But they didn't. I don't know off-hand how things are in other lib-controlled cities such as SF, LA, Boston, Chicago, etc, but I'm going out on a limb and guessing that it's the same story. Cops are not engaged in warfare. Their guns serve the same defensive purposes as any citizen's guns.

So the left does not exactly "want to ban assault weapons from those who are not engaged in warfare.". No what they want is to take these guns away from the individual, and leave them only in the hands of the collective.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2013, 08:24 PM
 
374 posts, read 236,228 times
Reputation: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Q:What is the real reason people want to ban guns?

Who is talking about banning guns?

When you are 79, sitting in a rocker on your front porch, stroking your gun with your shakey hand, will you ponder why you spent so much time and energy,worrying that "they" were coming for your guns?
That's funning you say that.....

Before 1934....ANYONE could walk into a hardware store and buy one of these for about $200.


John Dillinger Tribute - YouTube



Do you know what he used to break out of jail? Dillinger's Fake Pistol Sells for $20K | Field & Stream




He was a bad boy....and is still talked about. John Dillinger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Al Capone was a p***y!



Guns N' Roses-Back off ***** - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top