Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And you think only Obama and Hollywood should have protection right?
No
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751
Common, prove you truly stand behind Obama
Put a sign in your front yard .... "This Home Is Gun Free"
Or are you a hypocrite like the MSM reporter and Eric holder.
I know you think you are being witty and caustic with your unceasing repetitive diatribe but...you're not. My having a gun or not has nothing to do with supporting Obama and/or gun control. I know plenty of gun owners that support stringent background checks, decreased magazine capacities and other control measures. Of course, those people also don't believe Obama is the Anti-Christ or next coming of Hitler either. They are actually educated in politics and history.
His daughters' lives are at more risk than your typical citizen. Secret Service goes with the territory of being a high profile political family member. SS are federal law enforcement and thus are required to carry firearms.
I finally got a chance to watch the ad. The "punchline" is "armed security for his kids, gun free zones for yours". Now...just what is remotely wrong about that? What is inaccurate? I don't begrudge the president's kids having armed security. I do question the mentality that says a solution that somehow is perfectly reasonable for his children is somehow unreasonable for the children of the people that employ him. The level of narcissism the man displays knows no bounds.
Ummm. Didn't he just say, less than 24 hours ago, that one of his executive orders would be to provide funding to schools for "resource officers"? That funding can be used for guards. So what's the problem now?
I feel that the President, congress, and the nra can argue all day long, basically business as usual about gun/ammo restrictions. But to drag Obamas girls into the fray is disgusting. I just saw the NRA attack ad, and I cant believe they put this out. They really should be able to present cogent arguments for their side without doing this, its very sad.
I feel that the President, congress, and the nra can argue all day long, basically business as usual about gun/ammo restrictions. But to drag Obamas girls into the fray is disgusting. I just saw the NRA attack ad, and I cant believe they put this out. They really should be able to present cogent arguments for their side without doing this, its very sad.
You were told to be outraged.
No clear thinking, intellectually honest person would see this as an outrage.
Stating that the presidents daughters (not showing photos, or naming names) have armed protection 24/7.....but the same protection is not respected by obama for OUR children is simply the truth.
The leftie "rabbit ears" are getting more and more paranoid.
lol, alpha. Either Chrissy Tingle or Mr Ed the Talking Azz must have had an exploding head incident, and lefty goofs took their cue to start multiple threads about how outraged they are.
Obama uses other peoples children for his political gains. So there is no reason his cant be used.
His children are being attacked, Obama is. But his kids are the subject and in context, its absolutely a fair point by the NRA.
You take issue with hit? Oh well. Get over it. There's nothing wrong with what the NRA did.
You want to know what is wrong? Using children like Obama and other anti-life people do, without having the guts to tell them to their face that they would be just fine and proud had their mothers chose to say they didnt deserve a chance to breath and live.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.