Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-16-2013, 02:17 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Earlyretired View Post
I guess Im just saying allow an appeal before arresting anyone for trying to buy a gun and being denied...
Well sure, I agree. The government screws up all the time with innocent people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-16-2013, 02:18 PM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,651,677 times
Reputation: 4784
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Yet, none of those mass shooters were determined to be "seriously mentally ill" before they committed any crimes.

And you think some type of magic is going to occur because we're creating a database ?
The psychologist of the Aurora shooter had concerns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2013, 02:23 PM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,651,677 times
Reputation: 4784
Quote:
Originally Posted by LostInHouston View Post
I agree, I would like to see them prosecute more criminals who provide false info. But the main purpose of the background check system, is to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and the mentally unstable. I'm assuming all of those that failed the background check, were unable to buy weapons at those dealers.



No, I agree it's not. My point is we need to do more to get people who show bizarre behavior (especially teens/20 something males) screened for mental health issues, and ease up the restrictions to then get them into the NICS database if they are shown to be an imminent danger.
You've got a point. In this case, profiling is justified. It is primarily young males who commit most of the violence in our country, whether gang violence or mass shootings. Just leave women off the database..... heh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2013, 02:25 PM
 
19,023 posts, read 25,969,090 times
Reputation: 7365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Earlyretired View Post
A lot of denials and delays are due to incomplete court records and they are overturned...

I was delayed on my last purchase but it went through yesterday, no idea why, never happened before...

I know people with no record that have been denied and overturned on appeal, they never told them why...
Have you ever bought any guns in a anti gun state? If that answer is yes, states that are anti gun can cause delays, because they may not happen to 'feel' like working that day.

I got one of those buying a gun from a store i wasn't working in during the time i spent as a gun store counter clerk. A gun store counter clerk has to pass a harder bc and be finger printed like a criminal, in order to call NICS and etc...

However if you have purchased in anti states you will find your state has a waiver system. You get a FFL Dealer to call into NICS and NICS will mail you a waiver.

The only thing there is local state police will keep a copy of that waiver and you background check on a govt file. I have done this to get back at Mass...... My NICS checks blast through the system and in to NH State Police so fast Mass spins...

The worst checks i have passed are DARE to work with kids..... OMG the questions they ask made me sick. The first time several school ladies had to convince me they had taken the same checks.. And for DARE you take a check each time you do a course..... hardly seems worth it for the money, and i suppose it isn't, but the value comes from teaching skill sets to kids....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2013, 02:25 PM
 
Location: Clear Lake Area
2,075 posts, read 4,447,102 times
Reputation: 1974
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Well then set up a mental health screener next to the free condom box in school.
Monthly screenings for all. No parental permission needed.
Names will be sent to the Fed "discreetly" and the patient made to go to mandatory sessions. Hold the sessions at school and have them done by government appointed mental health professionals who can commit them on the spot if they think they are dangerous.
Why do you immediately jump to extremes? All or nothing, no gray area. It's like all those on the pro-gun side who equate an AWB to an all guns ban. It does nothing but sidetrack from what could be reasonable dialogue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2013, 02:26 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by ellemint View Post
The psychologist of the Aurora shooter had concerns.
Ok, but is "concerns" enough to have someone put into a mentally ill database ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2013, 02:27 PM
 
15,532 posts, read 10,504,683 times
Reputation: 15813
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
But is that "seriously mentally ill" ? Who gets to define that ?
No one feared enough to want to have him committed before he started shooting ?
And now his defense is claiming he tried to get help due to his mental illness.
I don't know about that.

So a picture or people's feelings is all it takes ?

We're back to the days of the mental asylums.
Husbands had their wife committed.
Parents had their children committed.

Who determines "normal" actions and looks ?
Oh, cry me a river. I'm probably going to have to start shooting clays with my great grandpa's shotgun because we can't get a grip on a few kids with their brains wired wrong. It's been said millions of times, but guns don't kill people, people do. Lock the little jerks up, throw away the key. Deal with it somehow for pete's sake, we have a problem.

Last edited by elan; 01-16-2013 at 02:38 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2013, 02:27 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by ellemint View Post
You've got a point. In this case, profiling is justified. It is primarily young males who commit most of the violence in our country, whether gang violence or mass shootings. Just leave women off the database..... heh.
Gang violence..these people don't buy their guns at Cabela's and fill out forms
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2013, 02:29 PM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,651,677 times
Reputation: 4784
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Ok, but is "concerns" enough to have someone put into a mentally ill database ?
The implementation of a mental illness database for gun purchases is daunting. But I would say one of the criteria that should be adopted is violent ideation or actions --- so if a person reveals to a psychiatrist that they are having thoughts of killing others, then they will be put on that list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2013, 02:29 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by elan View Post
Oh, cry me a river. I'm probably going to have to start shooting clays with my great grandpa's shootgun because we can't get a grip on a few kids with their brains wired wrong. It's been said millions of times, but guns don't kill people, people do. Lock the little jerks up, throw away the key. Deal with it somehow for pete's sake, we have a problem.
Ok well the problem seems to be access to guns.
That's what the WH is going to fix.

Put mental health specialists in schools but who knows what they will be able to do.
Can a government worker commit a kid as a danger to society ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top