Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is hysterical. They cut off the census information to the right that shows he's an immigrant from Russia, and they didn't show the top that shows he's in NYC. I can't link to Ancestry.com because it's a subscription service, but I think any of you can try it out on a free trial basis. Type Harrison J. Bounel in a search engine, go to the 1940 census, and up pops Harry living in NYC in 1940, born in 1890 in Russia, living as a lodger.
He's living in the Bronx, NY, and the enumeration district is 3-1199. He's on page 26, line 48. There's no spouse listed.
Sovereign Citizenship is the status held by our forefathers. George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, and everyone else who won their freedom from the British Empire had this status. It was the birthright of all Americans, and we were generous in extending this most important right to foreign-born persons through the naturalization laws. With this status, our unalienable rights of life, liberty, and property couldn't be infringed. During the Civil War a method was discovered by the leading attorneys, financiers, and politicians of the day to deprive us of this status.
The word "sovereign" is defined in the 6th edition of Black's Law Dictionary, published in 1990, as being, "A person, body, or state in which independent authority is vested; a chief ruler with supreme power; a king or other ruler in a monarchy." Prior to the War for American Independence, the British king was the sovereign and the American people were his subjects. The war's outcome changed all this.
State v. Manuel, North Carolina, Vol. 20, Page 121 (1838)
The term "sovereign citizen" is an oxymoron. To be a "citizen" must admit that one is subject to the rule of law, which is the prerogative of state sovereignty. To be "sovereign" admits no superior rule.
I think you are right; these people are in it for the money for as long as it lasts. None of the challenges to President Obama's eligibility have succeeded because there is no person that has standing to sue; and, for that reason, the federal courts do not have subject matter jurisdiction over the matter. These spurious lawsuits and frivolous appeals have no merit. They will slacken when their proponents are sanctioned under the federal rules. No doubt, the speculation will continue unabated; but after speculation has done its worst, they will finally cease when the lawyers find nothing more to be made from them.
There is nothing prohibiting a post election vetment by congress.
The Congress is not held to Article III "routing' restrictions.
Does the Congress have "standing"?
Well, yeah!
"Are you now, or have you ever been, the man you claim you are?"
This is hysterical. They cut off the census information to the right that shows he's an immigrant from Russia, and they didn't show the top that shows he's in NYC. .
So what if he is a immigrant. What has that have to do with anything? The key is the 1890 birthdate. The whole census can be seen in my OP and zoomed in on.
This is hysterical. They cut off the census information to the right that shows he's an immigrant from Russia, and they didn't show the top that shows he's in NYC. I can't link to Ancestry.com because it's a subscription service, but I think any of you can try it out on a free trial basis. Type Harrison J. Bounel in a search engine, go to the 1940 census, and up pops Harry living in NYC in 1940, born in 1890, living as a lodger.
He's living in the Bronx, NY, and the enumeration district is 3-1199. He's on page 26, line 48. There's no spouse listed.
Ancestry is good, but familysearch.org is better. since Mormons track genealogy, the census for 1940 is publicly available
The term "sovereign citizen" is an oxymoron. To be a "citizen" must admit that one is subject to the rule of law, which is the prerogative of state sovereignty. To be "sovereign" admits no superior rule.
Only one kind of citizenship, not two or more?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
