Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I know there are many radical right wingers who believe income inequality to be a good thing and the greater the inequality the better. If that is the case, then maybe they should move to CHile, Turkey or Mexico because those are the only three countries that have greater inequality than the U.S.
The large scale inequality of wealth is really a sad commentary on our current system and shows a real need for change. A good start would be to raise the inheritance tax to 90% for anything above 5 million so that everyone can start and compete on an even playing field.
I know there are many radical right wingers who believe income inequality to be a good thing and the greater the inequality the better. If that is the case, then maybe they should move to CHile, Turkey or Mexico because those are the only three countries that have greater inequality than the U.S.
The large scale inequality of wealth is really a sad commentary on our current system and shows a real need for change. A good start would be to raise the inheritance tax to 90% for anything above 5 million so that everyone can start and compete on an even playing field.
I know there are many radical right wingers who believe income inequality to be a good thing and the greater the inequality the better. If that is the case, then maybe they should move to CHile, Turkey or Mexico because those are the only three countries that have greater inequality than the U.S.
The large scale inequality of wealth is really a sad commentary on our current system and shows a real need for change. A good start would be to raise the inheritance tax to 90% for anything above 5 million so that everyone can start and compete on an even playing field.
Who in their right mind thinks those that have money will leave more than 5 mil in it to be pilfered? oh and btw quit stealing peoples money.
Income inequality is bad when the big government, that you love, crowns the winners and losers.
Who in their right mind thinks those that have money will leave more than 5 mil in it to be pilfered? oh and btw quit stealing peoples money.
Income inequality is bad when the big government, that you love, crowns the winners and losers.
You know, the overall spirit of the decree issued by those famous founding fathers intended for no level of aristocracy to arise nor have its citizens become indentured servants.
Yes, I know..tax the hell out of the rich so they are not so rich anymore.
That does nothing to help the poor though.
And the rich will have to continue to be rich in order to pay the high taxes to support the poor.
You'll never get rid if the rich that way and neither will you better the poor.
I know there are many radical right wingers who believe income inequality to be a good thing and the greater the inequality the better. If that is the case, then maybe they should move to CHile, Turkey or Mexico because those are the only three countries that have greater inequality than the U.S.
The large scale inequality of wealth is really a sad commentary on our current system and shows a real need for change. A good start would be to raise the inheritance tax to 90% for anything above 5 million so that everyone can start and compete on an even playing field.
Well then, you should be fuming mad at 0bama, since he has expanded poverty in the US to a fifty year high. Those 16 million new poor collecting Food Stamps were created these past four years. 0bama blew $5 trillion in new debt, and the only place that is growing is the rich Wall Street fat cats in the stock market.
Yes, I know..tax the hell out of the rich so they are not so rich anymore.
That does nothing to help the poor though.
And the rich will have to continue to be rich in order to pay the high taxes to support the poor.
You'll never get rid if the rich that way and neither will you better the poor.
All those trillions 0bama spent went to his corporate and political cronies, while the number of poor Americans only increased.
So the question to the dems is, do you really think the poor will benefit from a penny of those new taxes on the rich?
You know, the overall spirit of the decree issued by those famous founding fathers intended for no level of aristocracy to arise nor have its citizens become indentured servants.
Yep the fight was against all tyranny, not just British tyranny.
And yet, liberalisms loudest and biggest voices are among many in Hollywood. You know, the multi-millionaires who pretend or "sing" for a living. Don't preach to me until you get those folks to give most of their wealth away to those who aren't as well off. Them being liberal and so caring for those who have so little, I'm sure they'll gladly drop their over the top life styles for the liberal cause ...... Nah no they wont
Obamas fed is churning out money like no tomorrow, maybe ask him where its all going because John Q.Taxpayer is none the richer for it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
