Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-31-2013, 11:13 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,280,580 times
Reputation: 4269

Advertisements

If you haven't read the Feinstein words about what is to be banned maybe you should. She says, in her bill, that all guns which have one characteristic of assault weapons would be illegal. One of those listed characteristics is a pistol grip. Well now, my only gun is a handgun but the grip is a pistol grip and a progressive thinking judge could interpret her vaguely worded bill to mean anything with a pistol grip. Bye bye new handgun. I will always wonder how they can sit there and even consider this law with how it is written and could be interpreted by certain judges. Not really, since I know what the progressives that run the Democrat party want to achieve as far as guns are concerned.

Purposely Vague Language in New Gun Rules Could Outlaw all Guns : Political Outcast

 
Old 01-31-2013, 08:53 PM
 
472 posts, read 740,970 times
Reputation: 370
Repeat at least ten times -"no one wants to take your guns."
 
Old 01-31-2013, 08:56 PM
 
1,209 posts, read 1,036,586 times
Reputation: 522
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
If you haven't read the Feinstein words about what is to be banned maybe you should. She says, in her bill, that all guns which have one characteristic of assault weapons would be illegal. One of those listed characteristics is a pistol grip. Well now, my only gun is a handgun but the grip is a pistol grip and a progressive thinking judge could interpret her vaguely worded bill to mean anything with a pistol grip. Bye bye new handgun. I will always wonder how they can sit there and even consider this law with how it is written and could be interpreted by certain judges. Not really, since I know what the progressives that run the Democrat party want to achieve as far as guns are concerned.

Purposely Vague Language in New Gun Rules Could Outlaw all Guns : Political Outcast
Nonsense, paranoid nonsense.
 
Old 01-31-2013, 09:01 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,280,580 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weedsnake View Post
Repeat at least ten times -"no one wants to take your guns."
Do we need to repeat the names of those who have been saying that one for so long. You know, like Obama, Feinstein, Reid, Pelosi, Durbin and on and on? There are so many of them that the post would have to be too long to name them all.
 
Old 01-31-2013, 09:03 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,280,580 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by wytrvn View Post
Nonsense, paranoid nonsense.
Since you are so sure about what was said in the link that you didn't read maybe you could point out some of the paranoia you didn't read. I will wait for your reply but not with bated breath since I don't expect any reply from you.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top