Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-14-2013, 02:24 PM
 
20,504 posts, read 12,446,965 times
Reputation: 10328

Advertisements

I wish the black panters would mistake holder for a white racist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-14-2013, 02:56 PM
 
15,188 posts, read 8,727,227 times
Reputation: 7553
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
What Mr. Holder is saying is that there is no U.S. constitutional protection from a state deciding to ban homeschooling, as long as it does not ban it for some but not others. That is certainly within a state's domain to decide as it sees fit. There is no fundamental liberty to homeschool. The issue of whether parents should have a right to control how their child is educated, is a decision rightfully left to the legislature.

Those of you on the right should be cheering "states rights."
Eric holder is a proven liar. and this double talk should not fool a soul, except a fool.

This criminal and the regime he works for abhors the very notion of "states rights", as they have proven repeatedly. In addition, so long as the federal government interferes in education at the state level, with national standards imposed by means of extortion, the states are not acting independently, but are complying with standards the federal government has no authority to impose.

Secondly, the state legislatures do not have a legitimate authority to treat citizens as property any more than the federal government does .... and mandating attendance to a state run school, under threat of stealing people's children for refusing to comply, is not a legitimate power held by either state or federal authorities.

Yes, slavery is unconstitutional, and all are bound, federal and state, to respect the constitutional freedoms and rights outlined in that constitution.

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.


So, the 9th Amendment clearly says that those certain rights outlined in the constitution should not be construed as the only rights people have. Therefore it is totally illegitimate for Holder the liar to claim he can't find a reference in the constitution that prohibits the states from mandating education. It doesn't have to be stipulated ... the constitution is a delegation of authority to the federal government, which is limited to only those specified powers .... it has no other authority to act. But one of those powers is to protect individual rights, liberties and immunities from being violated by anyone ... including the state legislatures.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top