Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
She is one of few people on either side to have addressed corporate welfare, or as she usually calls it, 'crony capitalism' (a term I don't like, since crony capitalism is not really capitalism, IMO). It should be one of the great issues of our time, but neither side wants to touch it. Certainly not Pres Obama, and I don't see too many Republicans having much to say about it either. Ralph Nader did. Interesting that both Nader and Palin were basically purged.
I look forward to her speech, and I am betting she will not fail to address corporate welfare again.
Liberals are annoyed that Palin will speak at a major event such as CPAC. Palin in her speech is going to attack Obama and corrupt politicians, on both sides.
Where are you getting your information? I've never seen a conservative get upset when her names comes up, and it really doesn't come up all that often. Your liberal news sources probably bring her up more than our conservative ones.
I don't have a problem with her, I think she has come a long way since her days as McCain's running mate. She is eloquent and not afraid to say what others are thinking. I think she is a true conservative, from what I can tell.
Location: On the "Left Coast", somewhere in "the Land of Fruits & Nuts"
8,852 posts, read 10,462,476 times
Reputation: 6670
Why exactly would lib-ruls care about a has-been (or never-was) like Palin speaking at just another conservative circle jerk…. other than she's always such a great opportunity to yank on wingers' chains?!!
Besides, how else is she gonna keep finding suckers to contribute to her PAC?
Liberals are annoyed that Palin will speak at a major event such as CPAC. Palin in her speech is going to attack Obama and corrupt politicians, on both sides.
I consider myself a moderate politically(maybe a tad left of center) and I could care less if Palin speaks or not, I haven't watched a CPAC speech since Rush Limbaugh spoke while he was bouncing up and down at the podium, obviously high on oxy or some other upper. Yes Palin is irrelevant, she had her 15 minutes of fame.
Where are you getting your information? I've never seen a conservative get upset when her names comes up, and it really doesn't come up all that often. Your liberal news sources probably bring her up more than our conservative ones.
I don't have a problem with her, I think she has come a long way since her days as McCain's running mate. She is eloquent and not afraid to say what others are thinking. I think she is a true conservative, from what I can tell.
He probably got it from the #1 most trusted sourse of information on the left: hallucinations.
I will go out on a limb and predict at least 10 pages for this thread, and a 2-1 ratio of lib/con postings. All the usual lib suspects will feel compelled to chime in. Even after they read this post, they can't help themselves.
Why exactly would lib-ruls care about a has-been (or never-was) like Palin speaking at just another conservative circle jerk…. other than she's always such a great opportunity to yank on wingers' chains?!!
Well last year the mainstream and international media showed up to hear her speech at CPAC. Romney's people DID NOT like the overwhelming long applause and standing ovation she got from giving it. In fact she was the only person to get a standing ovation over the GOP candidates and their speeches.
Yes Palin is irrelevant, she had her 15 minutes of fame.
Not likely.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.