Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-05-2013, 12:44 AM
 
1,160 posts, read 1,430,792 times
Reputation: 946

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoke_Jaguar4 View Post
So are you advocating shooting the police if you think they're overstepping their bounds? How exactly would you use your gun to protect yourself from the government? Would it be OK for you to shoot up a federal building, or bomb it to the ground, if you thought you were justified?
A bit of a leading question there! We'll indulge you. Let's say you posted on a forum that gun laws are un-constitutional, and the government decides that under NDAA you are or may someday be a potential terrorist. They send a SWAT team to break down your door and charge in un-announced with no search warrant. Do you have the right to defend your family and property from such an invasion by government forces?

Last edited by Seeker5in1; 03-05-2013 at 01:09 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-05-2013, 12:44 AM
 
Location: Ohio
13,933 posts, read 12,893,585 times
Reputation: 7399
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoke_Jaguar4 View Post
And how would you determine the right reasons?

My "agenda" is to bring the 2nd Amendment discussion out of the vague, comfortable, abstractions and into concrete realities. A dead cop. A grieving widow. A shooter that acted as judge, jury, and executioner. What are the real limits?
the single mother who defended herself and her young against an intruder, the girl who attends college classes during the day and who walks home from work late at night that shot her would be rapist, the guy behind the counter at a gas station in a known bad part of town at 2 am that otherwise would have been robbed, the 15 year old in Texas who defended his 12 year old sister against two home invaders with his fathers AR15..............
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2013, 04:50 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,611,558 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
What you're trying to basically do is to use the Constitution as an excuse against any societal rules other than what is written in that document. But that's not how this society works.

Numerous amendments and laws of all kinds have been enacted over time in parallel with the Constitution. We have a Supreme Court that acts as interpreter of laws in relation to the Constitution. You don't have the right to decide you don't like a rule just because you think it conflicts with your interpretation of the Constitution.

Take this as an example: let's say that you run a red light and the cops get behind you and want to pull you over. Does the Constitution give you the right to resist arrest and keep going if you don't feel like you did anything wrong? You may like to think it does, but the reality is that you'd be wrong. You have to stop. You have to submit to questioning and potential ticketing or arrest, depending on the evidence of your transgression. That's not to say that the cop can do anything he wants to you - you have rights, and you have avenues for redress should they be violated. But you can't just decide that you're not going to follow laws and use the Constitution as an excuse.

And for the record, no one is stopping you from legally owning a gun.

Man is not the giver, of another mans rights.
God is the giver of man’s rights, according to the Declaration of Independence, and the right to defend one’s self and one’s family is not only a right, but it is a duty and responsibility before God, according to the Bible which is a demonstration of our love for others.
Therefore, the Second Amendment is not the source of our right. It merely recognizes that the right is to be free from any interference whatsoever to defend ourselves, our families and our communities from attack. This understanding is as old as human history.


There is a reason the first 10 are called the bill of rights and not just the first 10 amendments.
The bill of rights cannot be amended.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2013, 04:55 AM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,382,997 times
Reputation: 8672
The nine folks who get to decide what is, and isn't constitutional say otherwise.

Now you may think they are unconstitutional, but there was a reason why the judiciary isn't directly elected by the people. Founding fathers knew better.

But again, the nine folks who get to decide, decided that gun laws can be constitutional.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2013, 05:09 AM
 
Location: texas
9,127 posts, read 7,941,561 times
Reputation: 2385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
The nine folks who get to decide what is, and isn't constitutional say otherwise.

Now you may think they are unconstitutional, but there was a reason why the judiciary isn't directly elected by the people. Founding fathers knew better.

But again, the nine folks who get to decide, decided that gun laws can be constitutional.
May I just add that we the people also have that right through amending the Constitution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2013, 05:25 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,611,558 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimuelojones View Post
May I just add that we the people also have that right through amending the Constitution.



The bill of rights cannot be amended.
It is not called the first 10 amendments. It is called the bill of rights for a reason.
They keep you ignorant of that, do they.....
Ignorance!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2013, 05:38 AM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,239,563 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoke_Jaguar4 View Post
So are you advocating shooting the police if you think they're overstepping their bounds? How exactly would you use your gun to protect yourself from the government? Would it be OK for you to shoot up a federal building, or bomb it to the ground, if you thought you were justified?
Slippery slope for the OP, ain't it?

Oklahoma City Bombing - The 1995 Oklahoma City Bombing of the Murrah Federal Building

Quote:
McVeigh, angered by the Waco tragedy, decided to enact retribution to those he felt responsible -- the federal government, especially the FBI and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF). In downtown Oklahoma City, the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building held numerous federal agency offices, including those of the ATF.
OP, you can resist the FED all you want, but you know who will win the battle, don't you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2013, 05:47 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,611,558 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoJiveMan View Post



OP, you can resist the FED all you want, but you know who will win the battle, don't you?


I remember King George saying that too, to a bunch of hillbilly uneducated rednecks.
How did that turn out?


McVeigh, gave the ultimate sacrifice, for revenging free people that died in Waco. Actions do have consequences.
We all have choices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2013, 05:51 AM
 
7,214 posts, read 9,392,923 times
Reputation: 7803
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post

McVeigh, gave the ultimate sacrifice, for revenging free people that died in Waco. Actions do have consequences.
We all have choices.
Now you're glorifying the terrorist, Timothy McVeigh? Typical of the internet tough guy wannabes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2013, 05:55 AM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,239,563 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
I remember King George saying that too, to a bunch of hillbilly uneducated rednecks.
How did that turn out?


McVeigh, gave the ultimate sacrifice, for revenging free people that died in Waco.
Hmmm, you're sounding pretty radical here. You supported the killing of innocent people?

Quote:
The Oklahoma blast claimed 168 lives, including 19 children under the age of 6, and injured more than 680 people
Were the people in that federal building not free too?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top