Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-14-2013, 05:23 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,294 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15645

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by my54ford View Post
Would you bet your life on it????Hook that crap up to a life support system at a Hospital and see how long the patient lives!!!!
Space stations already do, good idea to have a backup for anything.

 
Old 03-14-2013, 06:03 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,744,889 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
If anything good came out of those government subsidies, it is the fact that companies figured out how to make solar power/panels cheaper to manufacture, and that will be useful going forward.
Nothing good comes out of government subsidies. They should all be cancelled.
 
Old 03-14-2013, 06:06 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,972 posts, read 22,157,422 times
Reputation: 13803
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
WOW!! Like I said early on in this thread: if there is anything positive that came out of the subsidies, it is the new inventions which decreased the cost of solar energy. I guess I could say 'inventions' in general, because once there is a market all kinds of innovative people jump in the game and come up with amazing inventions.
Just as long as we have the masterminds in government deciding what energy sources we can use, and where technology advances should occur.
 
Old 03-14-2013, 06:14 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,951,723 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
Solar does have its uses and applications, such as powering equipment in remote areas that cannot be reached by the power grid thru normal means.
I don't see why you give it such narrow use. If nearly every home in an area had solar roofs installed that area would need very little external generation and all for night, when there is an abundance of capacity.
 
Old 03-14-2013, 06:25 PM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,532,112 times
Reputation: 25816
I had solar panels for my pool and they were AWESOME! That damn gas heater cost a small fortune to run (though it definitely got the job done) and I always worried it because it was under my deck but too close to the wood.

I got two solar panels and ran the hoses out to it and - delightfully warm water.

Of course, it didn't exactly extend the swimming season until Thanksgiving or anything; but I didn't really need it to.

I realize I wasn't trying to heat my entire house but most pool owners I know are converting to solar panels because they are cheap to buy; cheap to install; and you don't have to pay for them to heat up a large body of water.
 
Old 03-14-2013, 06:40 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,009,955 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
As previously said, nuclear can't exist without subsidies either. And other nations are scaling back on nuclear in the wake of the Japanese disaster.

You just have to read what other countries are doing:


Tokelau becomes the first 100 percent solar-powered nation

Countries with 100% renewable energy | Make Wealth History

Anyone can poo poo renewable but it's evident that it is growing by leaps and bounds every year.

1400 residents as opposed to 320 million or so? LOL. Solar is fine but it isn't viable for the grid. It just can't be done. Now it's great for small things like heating a pool as mentioned above or to have a little solar thing for camping out. I've been looking at putting some on the home as the prices have come down and I get a 35% rebate from state and fed to do it but am maybe moving so will hold off. Anyone who thinks we can run the grid off it are not looking at reality. But that is how many behave.
 
Old 03-14-2013, 06:42 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,468,904 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
I had solar panels for my pool and they were AWESOME! That damn gas heater cost a small fortune to run (though it definitely got the job done) and I always worried it because it was under my deck but too close to the wood.

I got two solar panels and ran the hoses out to it and - delightfully warm water.

Of course, it didn't exactly extend the swimming season until Thanksgiving or anything; but I didn't really need it to.

I realize I wasn't trying to heat my entire house but most pool owners I know are converting to solar panels because they are cheap to buy; cheap to install; and you don't have to pay for them to heat up a large body of water.
Solar energy to heat your pool is absurd and I'll explain why.

So you have a 20,000 gallon pool...

The basic formula for pure water is 1 btu to raise 1 lb of water one degree F. That's the Specific Heat of pure water.

So you have 8.33 lbs of water in each gallon.

You'll need 166,666.666666666666666 btu to raise that pool one degree F above ambient (that's 13.88 tons from an air sourced heat pump). The larger the difference in ambient temps to the desired pool temp the more energy you'll need.

At best you'll get 10 watts per square foot of solar energy from solar panels.

Since one watt is equal to 3.413 but you'd need 48,832 sq feet of solar panels to get your increase of water temp 1 degree F per lb of water.

I can't think of a more wasteful use of money. Unless you have piles upon piles laying around it's a useless venture.

Of course if you're trying to heat up 50 gallons for your home's water heater it's not as bad. It's still very expensive and with the cost of electricity the payback is a very, very long time.
 
Old 03-14-2013, 06:45 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,009,955 times
Reputation: 5455
Hey if its your money do with it as you please. Heat up the ocean with solar panels and get the global warmers all upset as long as I don't have to pay for it.
 
Old 03-14-2013, 06:46 PM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,532,112 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
Solar energy to heat your pool is absurd and I'll explain why.

So you have a 20,000 gallon pool...

The basic formula for pure water is 1 btu to raise 1 lb of water one degree F.

So you have 8.33 lbs of water in each gallon.

You'll need 166,666.666666666666666 btu to raise that pool one degree F above ambient. The larger the difference in ambient temps to the desired pool temp the more energy you'll need.

At best you'll get 10 watts per square foot of solar energy from solar panels.

Since one watt is equal to 3.413 but you'd need 48,832 sq feet of solar panels to get your increase of water temp 1 degree F per lb of water.

I can't think of a more wasteful use of money. Unless you have piles upon piles laying around it's a useless venture.

Of course if you're trying to heat up 50 gallons for your home's water heater it's not as bad. It's still very expensive and with the cost of electricity the payback is a very, very long time.
Are you crazy? I paid a small fortune to run that gas heater and I paid next to nothing to heat it with solar panels and a solar cover. It worked wonderfully - did I mention they were cheap? Gas heater - not cheap. Heating up 30,000 gallons of water with small gas heater - not cheap.

Opening your pool a week early to allow the solar panels to heat it and then keep the heat in at night with a solar cover - cheaper.

Toasty warm pool water - achieved.

What's the problem?

Once your water has achieved the desired temp - you can then divert the water away from the solar panels so you aren't pumping the water that far out.
 
Old 03-14-2013, 06:54 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,210,872 times
Reputation: 17209
Solar covers are relatively inexpensive and do work well.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top