Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-24-2013, 06:16 PM
 
19,023 posts, read 25,972,397 times
Reputation: 7365

Advertisements

No Ban was over before it got started....... The grabbers are just going to have to suck it up.....

Don't like it, leave the USA..... The sooner the better too.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-24-2013, 06:25 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,572,254 times
Reputation: 29290
Quote:
Originally Posted by lizjo View Post
Are you slobbering on your keyboard as you watch?
i dunno about slobber, but you can practically hear the fap*fap*fapping in triple-m's adulation
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2013, 06:34 PM
 
8,560 posts, read 6,410,261 times
Reputation: 1173
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidkaos2 View Post
She's a bona fide idiot in the same way that every prominent Republican is called the same by liberals. There hasn't been a Republican in any highly visible position that hasn't been an idiot in the estimation of Democrats. And there hasn't been a prominent Democrat who hasn't been an idiot to Republicans.

Personally I don't think she's an idiot but I think she's a bona fide partisan hack who is more than happy to deliberately misrepresent and misinterpret things in order to put forth her ideology. She's a left wing version of Sean Hannity who even as a conservative I cannot respect due to his unrelenting partisanship even when it goes beyond reason.

I read Maddow's article on Justice Scalia over the VRA and it was indeed sheer idiocy. But I don't think it was that because Maddow is stupid, I think she was in perfect command of the facts but then purposely distorted them because she the facts to further her politics. The actual writing was quite competent and skilled, but the points she made were fundamental flaws of reasoning, which tells me they were deliberate.

The problem when you do that is that you appear to be an idiot to someone who doesn't share your ideology because you fall to the "how could you not understand that simple point, what are you some kind of moron" criticism.
I don't remember ever calling any Republican an "idiot," just not my style. However, I do understand your point. I like Maddow's perspective and that she is so liberal. How many other equally liberal folks are there to watch on TV political talk shows?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:50 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top