Why does the Ryan Budget add $500 billion to Defense? (radical, Clinton, Obama)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hey right wingers/Repubs/Conservatives...at what point do we stop adding more money to defense? What war are you Republicans planning on fighting? Shouldn't we be taking defense spending back down to pre-2001 levels?
Quote:
The budget would increase defense spending compared to current law by $500 billion over 10 years. Even though Ryan's plan increases defense spending compared to the sequester, the numbers are a cut compared to his last budget.
He should be cutting it. When Romney said he was against cutting the defense budget it sealed it for me that I would be voting third party last election.
He should be cutting it. When Romney said he was against cutting the defense budget it sealed it for me that I would be voting third party last election.
Or should I somehow try and blame this on Obama?
I just wanna know what it's all about. I know Republicans believe in a strong defense (just like everyone else), but at what point do they become embarrassed about our high levels of defense spending?
I just wanna know what it's all about. I know Republicans believe in a strong defense (just like everyone else), but at what point do they become embarrassed about our high levels of defense spending?
We can have an extremely strong defense if we do as Paul states and close a bunch of bases around the world.
The US debt clock shows military spending at about $665,000,000,000 this year! Add to that what we pay for the 17 intelligence agencies and we're talking nearly 3/4 of a trillion dollars. How long can we keep this up!
Hey right wingers/Repubs/Conservatives...at what point do we stop adding more money to defense? What war are you Republicans planning on fighting? Shouldn't we be taking defense spending back down to pre-2001 levels?
The repulbican wanted to take everythig back to 2007 levels but democrats refused. They also agree to takig 50% of the cuts from defense i teh sequester. they allowed tax increases. Not sure what Democrats want really has they agree then they bitv ch about cuts that are not that deep.Its as even they agreed is only a down pl ayment without cuttign entitlements. Een CBVO said that defense has remianed at near 4% since the Clinton cuts. They wanrned alos that defense is not there to cut like then.many Democrats seem to mistake defense spending to include war spending. That is separate from defense budget spending.Obama can cut war spending when he wants by just not spending on it.But its still ot goig to cut the defense bus dget. Now we see mnay Democrats wanting to stop cuts because most defense spending supports alot of jobs most in US just has they objected to base closings. and insisted on planes being keep to be built we een when the mil;itary wanted to cut certain ones.Follow the moeny ;like always.
Didn't some big-time general say that the national debt is a bigger threat to our security than radical Islam?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.