Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-05-2013, 11:11 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,663,022 times
Reputation: 18521

Advertisements

Numbers recently out, show 63% of working age people are not working....

How does that equate to 8% unemployment numbers?



Seems a more accurate number would be 63% unemployment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2013, 11:14 AM
 
Location: On Top
12,373 posts, read 13,201,005 times
Reputation: 4027
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Numbers recently out, show 63% of working age people are not working....

How does that equate to 8% unemployment numbers?



Seems a more accurate number would be 63% unemployment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2013, 11:20 AM
 
Location: My beloved Bluegrass
20,126 posts, read 16,173,562 times
Reputation: 28335
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Numbers recently out, show 63% of working age people are not working....

How does that equate to 8% unemployment numbers?



Seems a more accurate number would be 63% unemployment.
I'm not counted in the unemployed numbers, I've retired. Three of my children are not counted in the unemployment numbers as they are in school full-time and not looking for work. We are all counted among the 63% working age non-participants in the work force. I am a little troubled that my 16 year-old daughter is considered in that percentage, I think kids still attending high school ought to be part of a different set of stats. Bottom line, in my little family, we have only a 33% participation rate in the workforce and none of us fit in the definition of the unemployment numbers..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2013, 11:23 AM
 
Location: Land of Thought and Flow
8,323 posts, read 15,175,551 times
Reputation: 4957
All sorts of reasons for the 63%. Retired, students (high school or college), stay-at-home parents/spouses, disabled persons, etc. Then there are people who work under the table without reporting the job or income... and then you have those people whom are just too lazy to even look for work, who leech off of family and/or friends.

Technically, they're all "unemployed" according to the government, but many of them can't or don't want to work and thus don't get counted for the statistic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2013, 11:29 AM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,680,438 times
Reputation: 9174
There's no way the numbers add up.

That said, I, too, am retired, but I retired more or less by force when my employer shut its doors for good. That seemed like a good time, as I was eligible for Social Security. So I called myself retired and started collecting money I'd paid in all those years.

Life is good!

I made it through the Carter years when all around me, people were losing their jobs. I am glad I don't have to worry about it through the 0bama years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2013, 11:32 AM
 
Location: My beloved Bluegrass
20,126 posts, read 16,173,562 times
Reputation: 28335
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
There's no way the numbers add up.

That said, I, too, am retired, but I retired more or less by force when my employer shut its doors for good. That seemed like a good time, as I was eligible for Social Security. So I called myself retired and started collecting money I'd paid in all those years.

Life is good!

I made it through the Carter years when all around me, people were losing their jobs. I am glad I don't have to worry about it through the 0bama years.
The Carter years were horrible but I am beginning to think this round may ellipse them, it's definitely going to last longer, mainly because we kept the same administration in place despite the economic climate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2013, 11:39 AM
 
Location: San Francisco
8,982 posts, read 10,468,275 times
Reputation: 5752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
So I called myself retired and started collecting money I'd paid in all those years.

Life is good!
You're welcome.

(Barring an unfortunate illness or accident, there's no way you'll be collecting only the money you paid in -- you will almost certainly collect double or triple that amount or more, courtesy of those of us who are paying into the system now.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2013, 11:41 AM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,157,338 times
Reputation: 12921
That's great... the number not working. My parents are not working. I hope to not be working some day. It's great that such a large number of people can achieve this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2013, 11:41 AM
 
Location: Salisbury,NC
16,759 posts, read 8,223,014 times
Reputation: 8537
So lets see the people born in 1948 turn 65. The people born in 1958 turn 55. If they all started working between 1970-1980 they have between 43-33 years in the workforce. Yeah I would say that is the reason why there is a large number of people not looking for work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2013, 11:45 AM
 
Location: Salisbury,NC
16,759 posts, read 8,223,014 times
Reputation: 8537
Quote:
Originally Posted by pch1013 View Post
You're welcome.

(Barring an unfortunate illness or accident, there's no way you'll be collecting only the money you paid in -- you will almost certainly collect double or triple that amount or more, courtesy of those of us who are paying into the system now.)
Well the same is true for the retirees of the last (in my case) 33 years, who I paid for gladly. I see that as a non issue as thirty years from now today's 20-30 year olds will be retiring.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:49 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top