Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Very true that it's the right thing to do or that it would do a lot to help Dems up for election?
We could pass a strict background check that covers every single sale in the country and it would be meaningless as few would follow it.
There are some republicans that want to vote the other way but they are up for reelection in 2014, no matter if the filbuster prevails or they actually vote it doesn't bode well, damed if they do damed if they don't.
There are some republicans that want to vote the other way but they are up for reelection in 2014, no matter if the filbuster prevails or they actually vote it doesn't bode well, damed if they do damed if they don't.
That want to vote for what?
But yes, it doesn't matter as far as the problems we face are concerned.
Things have changed. Explain this, since all the links he posted indicate the bill won't pass (both parties)why are they filibustering. A filibuster is primariy used to delay a vote that will pass, what is the point?
Things have changed. Explain this, since all the links he posted indicate the bill won't pass (both parties)why are they filibustering. A filibuster is primariy used to delay a vote that will pass, what is the point?
The point is that you come out in the strongest terms possible when the vote is an attack on the Constitution.
Things have changed. Explain this, since all the links he posted indicate the bill won't pass (both parties)why are they filibustering. A filibuster is primariy used to delay a vote that will pass, what is the point?
I don't think things have changed. Reid is still not bringing the assault weapon ban or mag ban up for a vote. The only thing I see them moving on now is the background checks.
The point is that you come out in the strongest terms possible when the vote is an attack on the Constitution.
I understand that't the way Rand Paul works, just didn't know there were 14 others including Mitch McConnell. He was alone on Benghazi but this speaks large for the republican senate, doesn't bode well for 2014. The AWB in 1994 didn't see anyting close to this,no challenge over 10 years, why now?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
