Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-09-2013, 07:44 PM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,888 posts, read 10,041,959 times
Reputation: 7693

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVA1990 View Post
Lame attempt. That applied to neutrality legislation. I guess I can only have so many battleships too.
Lame attempt at what?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-09-2013, 07:45 PM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,888 posts, read 10,041,959 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by harrier View Post
this thread = massive fail.
x2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2013, 07:46 PM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,263,395 times
Reputation: 6920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
The Second Amendment.
But nobody has given me a case clearly stating ammo is considered an arm. Under the neutrality law mentioned above, ammo is cited separately.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2013, 07:48 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,231,797 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVA1990 View Post
But nobody has given me a case clearly stating ammo is considered an arm.
Post 32.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2013, 07:50 PM
 
Location: mancos
7,788 posts, read 8,033,284 times
Reputation: 6701
[quote=CAVA1990;29055209]But nobody has given me a case clearly stating ammo is considered an arm Ammo is not a freaking arm it more usless than a nice round rock if I needed to crack your head with just my throwing arm. better to have a sling shot thow or as with ammo a gun
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2013, 07:51 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,021,470 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
In 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court held in District of Columbia v. Heller that the Second Amendment prohibits the Federal government from passing laws prohibiting an individual's right to possess a hand gun in the home and requiring any firearms in the home to be inoperable during possession.

A gun without ammo is inoperable.

FEDERAL FIREARMS LAWS
End of thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2013, 07:54 PM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,263,395 times
Reputation: 6920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
End of thread.
Heller clearly did not address regulation of ammunition as that wasn't a part of the law disallowed by the court.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2013, 07:56 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,231,797 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVA1990 View Post
Heller clearly did not address regulation of ammunition as that wasn't a part of the law disallowed by the court.
Obviously you simply prefer to wallow in your ignorance here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2013, 07:57 PM
 
Location: mancos
7,788 posts, read 8,033,284 times
Reputation: 6701
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVA1990 View Post
Heller clearly did not address regulation of ammunition as that wasn't a part of the law disallowed by the court.
Stop It !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2013, 07:59 PM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,263,395 times
Reputation: 6920
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Obviously you simply prefer to wallow in your ignorance here.
No need to be rude. I'm asking for legal understanding. I'm not arguing philosophy. I honestly haven't seen this question clearly answered in constitutitional precedent including Heller.

You could have an operable firearm with one or a few bullets, not unlimited quantities. You don't need that many to protect yourself at home. Could the govt. limit possession to a certain amount?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:51 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top