Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-12-2013, 09:23 PM
 
41,109 posts, read 25,804,449 times
Reputation: 13868

Advertisements

Jim Sinegal spoke at the DNC this past summer.

One of the people who will benefit from this deal will be Costco's co-founder and former CEO Jim Sinegal who owns more than two million shares of its stock and will collect about $14.4 million from the special dividend. Had he taken that next year, he could be slapped with a tax rate of 43.4 percent if Obama's proposed tax increases become law (boosting the tax rate on dividends to over 20 percent and adding a surcharge tax on millionaires).

People don't even realize Obama is not going after the wealthy, just go after the working suckers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-12-2013, 09:23 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,529,708 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
Exactly, with a net worth of $11 million he is wealthy but goes after the sucker who don't have anything near $11 million. People on the left are so jealous and naive.

Did you see the story about Costco borrowing $3.5 billion to pay a special $7 a share dividend to its stockholders before year's end to avoid being hit by President Obama's higher tax on investors?

What makes this story especially juicy is that it reveals how Obama's fat cat supporters, who bankrolled his bid for a second term and embraced his proposed tax increases, have taken steps to shield themselves from the president's "tax the rich" fiscal money grab.

Actually, a lot of people on the left would love to tax wealth if they could.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2013, 09:24 PM
 
41,109 posts, read 25,804,449 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cavaturaccioli View Post
Obama paid more than his 'fair share'. Eighteen plus percent is more than anyone should have to pay to the fed.
lol, really? But many people are paying much more than 18%. So why doesn't Obama pay 39% like he proposes. Oh we are talking about the dear leader, that's why.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2013, 09:25 PM
 
41,109 posts, read 25,804,449 times
Reputation: 13868
Obama has failed abysmally to spur faster, job-creating economic growth which is sorely in need of a booster shot from private capital markets -- the very investors he wants to tax into oblivion in 2013.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2013, 09:30 PM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
5,637 posts, read 6,530,723 times
Reputation: 7220
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cavaturaccioli View Post
Obama paid more than his 'fair share'. Eighteen plus percent is more than anyone should have to pay to the fed.
Agreed!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2013, 09:31 PM
 
Location: NoVa
803 posts, read 1,671,400 times
Reputation: 873
So in other words, you're saying we should raise taxes on the wealthy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2013, 09:31 PM
 
Location: Jacksonville, FL
11,161 posts, read 10,744,675 times
Reputation: 9830
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
Obama has a net worth of $11 million. He just released his 2012 federal income tax returns. He and the First Lady filed their income tax returns jointly and reported adjusted gross income of $608,611. The Obamas paid $112,214 in total tax.

Obama's effective federal income tax rate is 18.4%.
I'd say Obama paid too much in taxes. Everyone should be paying a flat tax of 10% or so and we should move away from the class warfare that the politicians have the people focused on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2013, 09:31 PM
 
1,922 posts, read 1,749,335 times
Reputation: 798
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Anyone seen Romney's 2012 tax returns? Or his post-election loss 2011 tax returns revisions?
What's does that have to do with anything?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2013, 09:32 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,880,365 times
Reputation: 10791
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg_IA View Post
What's does that have to do with anything?
Just wondering if Obama paid a lower effective tax rate than Mr. Romney.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2013, 09:34 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,880,365 times
Reputation: 10791
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
It was just as wrong when you said it.

Show me Romney's 2013 tax returns so we can see.

Here is the pdf for Obama's returns"
Document: President Obama's 2012 tax return - Politico Staff - POLITICO.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top