Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So the left wants to minimize the Muslim connection. The younger bomber brother has already admitted it was a religious reason for the attack. But is it meaningless as the left is trying to spin?
If it was a white supremacist that had blown up a black church would it be meaningless? If a Nazi group had blown up a synagogue would it have been a meaningless motive?
I think in these two cases the left would have been yelling until their vocal cords were broken about how the motive did mean something. But when its Muslim it suddenly is not meaningful.
What is it about the left that they so desperately try to protect the Radial Muslims?
It would be really, really nice if you linked to what Ms. Maddow actually said or wrote instead of putting your words in her mouth and then attacking those words. Does strawman come to mind?
So the left wants to minimize the Muslim connection. The younger bomber brother has already admitted it was a religious reason for the attack. But is it meaningless as the left is trying to spin?
If it was a white supremacist that had blown up a black church would it be meaningless? If a Nazi group had blown up a synagogue would it have been a meaningless motive?
I think in these two cases the left would have been yelling until their vocal cords were broken about how the motive did mean something. But when its Muslim it suddenly is not meaningful.
What is it about the left that they so desperately try to protect the Radial Muslims?
Not trying to protect anyone. But calling it a Muslim terror attack when it isn't just because you can is not helpful to anybody at all.
Listen, you can give any excuse you want as to why you're a murdering innocent killing bastard. But at the end of the day, if it's just you doing it because you want to, then you're just a murdering innocent killing bastard, and not some kind of religious martyr.
Not trying to protect anyone. But calling it a Muslim terror attack when it isn't just because you can is not helpful to anybody at all.
You mean like linking the bombings to the right wing....and wishing it was a white person? Things like that, then I'll agree with you. Were you in any of the threads denouncing any of those?
So the left wants to minimize the Muslim connection. The younger bomber brother has already admitted it was a religious reason for the attack. But is it meaningless as the left is trying to spin?
If it was a white supremacist that had blown up a black church would it be meaningless? If a Nazi group had blown up a synagogue would it have been a meaningless motive?
I think in these two cases the left would have been yelling until their vocal cords were broken about how the motive did mean something. But when its Muslim it suddenly is not meaningful.
What is it about the left that they so desperately try to protect the Radial Muslims?
Do you have a link to the comments of Ms. Maddow? I'd like to read/view those remarks in their totality and context. Thanks.
Location: East St. Paul 651 forever (or North St. Paul) .
2,860 posts, read 3,387,686 times
Reputation: 1446
Leftist loon is an Islamofascist apologist. Considering she is openly homosexual, I wonder if she supports what Muslim theocracies do to people like her under rule of law?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW
I wonder if all the people calling for a Crusade against Islam are willing to fight in that war?
I'd be willing to kick 'em all out of America. That'd be a start.
The reality for me, honestly as an isolationist conservative, is that I'd like to take ALL our men and women out of any Muslim-majority entity and leave them in the stone age they are living in and let them have their Sharia Law. I think that would be one heck of a start. Cultural relativism, you know?
Leftist loon is an Islamofascist apologist. Considering she is openly homosexual, I wonder if she supports what Muslim theocracies do to people like her under rule of law?
I'd be willing to kick 'em all out of America. That'd be a start.
The reality for me, honestly as an isolationist conservative, is that I'd like to take ALL our men and women out of any Muslim-majority entity and leave them in the stone age they are living in and let them have their Sharia Law. I think that would be one heck of a start. Cultural relativism, you know?
You support strawmen arguments with no sources, so it makes sense to me you feel the way you do.
You mean like linking the bombings to the right wing....and wishing it was a white person? Things like that, then I'll agree with you. Were you in any of the threads denouncing any of those?
Did R. Maddow make those accusations? Why not stick to her comments and not conflate Maddow's comments with any other.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
