Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Moreover, there still is a presumption of innocence until a court decides otherwise.
uh hum, of course Chris Matthews idea of presumed innocence below. Chris Matthews said
“Normally, domestic terrorists, people tend to be on the far right, well that’s not a good category, just extremists, let’s call them that. Do they advertise after they do something like this? Do they try to get credit as a group or do they just hate America so much or its politics or its government that they just want to do the damage, they don’t care if they get public credit, if you will?”
So much for your presumption of innocent. Oh, that is only if it is someone on the left.
This is inconvenient for the Food Stamp President who has overseen a huge increase in the number of people receiving government aid while subtracting millions from the workforce.
Politically most inconvenient for Obama is that immigration was supposed to be the great wedge issue upon which to fracture the Republicans, add 11 million Democrats to the voter rolls, and solidify progressive control of America forever. Now we have an example of the dire consequences of letting just anyone at all into the country and being as compassionate toward them (as the liberals see it) as we were to the Tsarnaev clan.
Once again, you're posting in the wrong discussion. Cut and paste? Anti-Obama ... even if the topic was the sunny weather in Miami. LOL!
I love watching liberals defend the Boston Bomber under the guise of privacy rights. It solidifies what we've known all along about the cowards on the left.
Some of us have enjoyed the anti-Americans posting in these discussions about Boston, saying 'to hell with our Constitution, Bill of Rights and other laws." Of course the RWNJs are the first to compain when some cracker is involved, that their rights are being violated. LOL!
I love watching liberals defend the Boston Bomber under the guise of privacy rights. It solidifies what we've known all along about the cowards on the left.
I think that in part of the welfare application process there is a checkoff for Party affiliation and registration....nuff said..
I love watching liberals defend the Boston Bomber under the guise of privacy rights. It solidifies what we've known all along about the cowards on the left.
We shouldnt get to pick and choose when we want government to protect our pricy. I want government to mind their own dam business, prosecute criminals, and leave the rest of us alone.
I love watching liberals defend the Boston Bomber under the guise of privacy rights. It solidifies what we've known all along about the cowards on the left.
protect him from what...he's dead. Once you are dead, you have no more rights...
but! What gives with wanting to freakishly know every detail of this loser? It's like the right cant let him go...weekend at bernie's. It's as if the right is carring around his dead corpse saying..."see how bad the left is...see".
Every freaking revelation...is another idiot making some liberal= bomber supposed link.
It's mind-numbing the amount of time wing-whiners put into scouring the worst scumbag rags on the internet... dumpster-diving for any scrap of crap to post.
It's freaking sad and most definitely pathetic at the same time. It would be laughable, but people died...so it no joke.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.