Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-23-2013, 12:00 AM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,258,959 times
Reputation: 18824

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
I didn't bother to click the link given the reports that it was all anonymous-based accusations. We'll leave that tactic to Sen. Harry Reid, the NYT and the WaPo.

Nonetheless I don't doubt that Pres. Obama was out of his depth at U of Chicago. He doesn't know how to use "lie" and "lay," and during the debates he misused the phrase "beg the question," which does not mean "provoke the question." Rather it's a logic term that means essentially to assume that which is to be proven. These are common errors, but they are errors that any U of C student would have had squared away by soph. year.

U of C is kind of like the Navy Seals of American universities. They outwork everyone, with the possible exception of MIT. Harvard, Yale, Stanford, etc. are all great schools but they are all 2nd tier to Chicago. Chicago sacrifices nothing to pure academics. Case in point, I don't think there has ever been a U of C student to go into the NBA. Harvard, Stanford, and Yale all have sent people to the NBA.

All of this doesn't mean that Obama is not a very sharp guy and smooth operator. It just means that he is not much of an academic.
Yea, not much of an academic.

That's why he's a double Ivy guy. You know...most of those people aren't very academic.

That's because the smart guys go to schools like Ole Miss and Texas.

I swear, you guys try to hold it in, but you can't. It always manages to find a way out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-23-2013, 02:22 AM
 
1,730 posts, read 1,364,319 times
Reputation: 760
All you have to do is look at the guy and you can see he's lazy and arrogant.
Perfect qualifications to be a lib.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2013, 02:34 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,587,153 times
Reputation: 24780
Default Chicago Law Professors: Obama Was Lazy And Unqualified

Quote:
Originally Posted by Proud White Guy View Post
Too bad this important information didn't come out earlier during the 2008 campaign.




Chicago Law Professors: Obama Was Lazy and Unqualified

The other professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school....

RWNJ website slags on Democratic president, citing "unnamed sources."

Shocking!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2013, 02:35 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,587,153 times
Reputation: 24780
Smile don't forget...

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoD Guy View Post
All you have to do is look at the guy and you can see he's lazy and arrogant.
Perfect qualifications to be a lib.
To you, he's Mr President.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2013, 02:51 AM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,749,959 times
Reputation: 6594
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Yea, not much of an academic.

That's why he's a double Ivy guy. You know...most of those people aren't very academic.

That's because the smart guys go to schools like Ole Miss and Texas.

I swear, you guys try to hold it in, but you can't. It always manages to find a way out.
Dems tend to have a double standard when it comes to things like Ivy League education. George W gets an MBA from Harvard, but he's an idiot? Doesn't that make it completely hypocritical to cite Obama's "Ivy League education" as proof of Obama's intelligence??

I think Obama is a very intelligent man with tremendous charisma. He just completely clueless as a president because he doesn't seem to know how to lead. He doesn't know how to compromise. He has no earthly clue how to bring people with opposing ideologies together to work for the common good. Instead his tenure has increased the division in this nation. No president has presided over a more bitterly politically divided country than he is now -- not in living memory.

True, the OP is citing a completely biased source obviously. But what truth do we honestly have on all matters Obama? How much is cleaned up or sanitized to make him sound better? How much is real. His college records are a closely guarded state secret. When you act like you have something to hide, people start to get suspicious and create conspiracy theories. But I'd like to see a real source on what the OP posted before I consider it credible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2013, 03:03 AM
 
Location: texas
9,127 posts, read 7,954,740 times
Reputation: 2385
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
I tend to agree with you, but then again, what fool would go public with this, after seeing the depth of the scandals that go after political enemies of Obama.
Sarah Palin just came out "guns ablazing" with her latest criticism of the President...yet these pansies have less balls than she to do the same???

Sad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2013, 04:35 AM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,445,024 times
Reputation: 6462
Actually there was murmurs of this back in '08 folks chose not to care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2013, 04:41 AM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,445,024 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010 View Post
Dems tend to have a double standard when it comes to things like Ivy League education. George W gets an MBA from Harvard, but he's an idiot? Doesn't that make it completely hypocritical to cite Obama's "Ivy League education" as proof of Obama's intelligence??

I think Obama is a very intelligent man with tremendous charisma. He just completely clueless as a president because he doesn't seem to know how to lead. He doesn't know how to compromise. He has no earthly clue how to bring people with opposing ideologies together to work for the common good. Instead his tenure has increased the division in this nation. No president has presided over a more bitterly politically divided country than he is now -- not in living memory.

True, the OP is citing a completely biased source obviously. But what truth do we honestly have on all matters Obama? How much is cleaned up or sanitized to make him sound better? How much is real. His college records are a closely guarded state secret. When you act like you have something to hide, people start to get suspicious and create conspiracy theories. But I'd like to see a real source on what the OP posted before I consider it credible.
The Left will say Bush is an elite WASP and thus got into the Ivies not on merit but family ties while Obama got in on merit. However Obama was a mediocre student and was only accepted because he belongs to a group where mediocre students and worse dominates. Universities desperate to get in more Blacks would have saw Obama as a good catch. Well spoken from the far reaches of empire, Black on paper but not like those Blacks up in Harlem.

The fact that Obama transferred to Columbia speaks volumes. It is extremely rare to transfer to an Ivy. Columbia wanted Obama badly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2013, 04:44 AM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,076,663 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cnote11 View Post
Hearsay and undisclosed source means no legitimacy. This may well be true, but this isn't quite the effective way of proving so.
Our experience with him is proof enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2013, 05:00 AM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,445,024 times
Reputation: 6462
The first debate against Romney proved how lightweight he is intellectually. Romney carved him up and spit him out leaving Obama a sputtering, stuttering mess. Still he won though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top