Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The simple truth is, the world of academia is full of petty nonsense. It's pretty easy to find some professor who is full of outrage towards some other professor for no important reason. Unless evidence is given, the random griping should be ignored.
Too bad this important information didn't come out earlier during the 2008 campaign.
Nonsense. Who cares? What about his kindergarten grades? He used to pinch the other kids...
You never give up, do you? Lets re-investigate his birth certificate. The Donald (when free from the apprentice) may finance another investigation, sending private detectives to Hawaii. And Michelle? Her dress cost too much... (what better proof that Obama can't be president?)
But maybe try a better strategy: simply criticize Obama's policies that fail(ed) and suggest better ones. What about that?
But it is correct in saying "he was lazy, unqualified" because that would have been true. His academic record was so lame that it cannot ever be shared with the public, and will never be because of the embarrassment it would cause and the questions it would raise. He was purely a chaperoned protegee of the overlords of liberal academia and Saudi Islamic benefactors who had doors of acceptance opened for him regardless of his low intellectual abilities.
But he was a great coordinator, after doing that professionally for four years, and that was what helped him get chosen as the coordinator in chief (President of the Harvard Law Review), not his grade scores. His poor academic performance is why he had to turn down an internship with an appellate judge as all Presidents typically were offered. It would have exposed him.
Really? You've seen his grades and records?
I thought that was a huge complaint by the right - that President Obama hasn't "released" his academic record.
So, since you apparently have seen those records, perhaps you would care to share them with those of us who haven't seen them.
"How many academics are behind on thier publications"??!?! 25 years behind?
I have published over twenty papers in the peer reviewed literature. NO ONE in academics (who wants to secure tenure) is "behind" on publications.
All "scientific papers" are written "for free". One obtains grants to pursue studies which they publish "for free". The benefit? Academic promotion.
I think the above is one of the most bizarre Obama apologist posts I have read. Are you really saying that Obama will go back and publish in Harvard Law Review 25 years later?
I hope you have a proof reader.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
