Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-17-2013, 08:45 AM
bUU bUU started this thread
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,709,672 times
Reputation: 8798

Advertisements

Supreme Court strikes down Arizona law requiring proof of citizenship to vote - U.S. News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-17-2013, 08:47 AM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,038,973 times
Reputation: 3603
Unreal. To not have to prove you belong here to vote is unbelievable to me. Its common friggin sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2013, 08:51 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,076 posts, read 51,246,227 times
Reputation: 28325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tilt11 View Post
Unreal. To not have to prove you belong here to vote is unbelievable to me. Its common friggin sense.
Me too, but that was not the issue decided. It was whether a state could go further than the federal law in its requirements. The feds do not require proof.

Also, it put a burden on certain groups like naturalized citizens. They would have to go in person to register because it is illegal to copy citizenship papers.

It was 7-2 which is a pretty solid rejection.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2013, 08:54 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,083,461 times
Reputation: 3954
How funny. Even Scalia didn't buy the Republican bull****.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2013, 08:55 AM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,215,209 times
Reputation: 18824
Yep...the Feds will retain the power, not the states. And it was a pretty solid rejection too.

Maybe my state will get back to doing things to make the state better instead of always trying to cause controversy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2013, 08:55 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
It discriminates against those that aren't here legally yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2013, 09:02 AM
 
Location: My beloved Bluegrass
20,126 posts, read 16,167,528 times
Reputation: 28335
They only struck it down because such a law would have to be federal. Maybe it's time to start pressuring our elected officials to enact Voter ID laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2013, 09:04 AM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,457,656 times
Reputation: 4243
So in reality, sanctuary cities are not legal and Unconstitutional because the Feds didn't give the ok.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2013, 09:06 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
So in reality, sanctuary cities are not legal and Unconstitutional because the Feds didn't give the ok.
If you enact a law that favors illegals then it is ok in the eyes of the Fed.
If you enact a law that excludes illegals then it is unconstitutional because only the Fed can make those types of rulings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2013, 09:07 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,083,461 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
So in reality, sanctuary cities are not legal and Unconstitutional because the Feds didn't give the ok.
To connect those dots, you first have to actually have dots. This decision has exactly nothing to do with "sanctuary cities."

This is a narrow ruling based explicitly and solely on the National Voter Registration Act. Nothing more, nothing less, nothing else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top