Occupy is needed (unemployment rate, liberals, company, India)

[pknopp]

Originally Posted by Gtownoe

Your really showing how uninformed you are.

Yep, nobody has the time to teach a history class here.

[lionsgators]

Originally Posted by Gtownoe

Your really showing how uninformed you are.



PK I say we start with calling out traitors.

trashing public parks and restaurant bathrooms much?

[pghquest]

Originally Posted by pknopp

The courts didn't enact change. They simply made it the law.

if it wasnt the law, and they made it the law, isnt that change

[pghquest]

Originally Posted by Gtownoe

What was the Boston Tea Party? Who were we Revolting against?

The Boston Tea Party was protesting the EXACT OPPOSITE of what Occupy wants, which is why the Occupy movement is a complete joke and always will be.

[pghquest]

Originally Posted by pknopp

The Tea Party wasn't a revolution. Are you saying that to be successful the Occupy movement needs to resort to destroying the property of others?

Did already do destroy the property of others, which is why they have no respect from the public.

[pknopp]

Originally Posted by pghquest

The Boston Tea Party was protesting the EXACT OPPOSITE of what Occupy wants, which is why the Occupy movement is a complete joke and always will be.

Occupy argued just like the Tea Party against the bail out of the banks. Basically that is the same complaint the founders had. Being taxed on something they did not agree with or have any real say about it.

[pknopp]

Originally Posted by pghquest

Did already do destroy the property of others, which is why they have no respect from the public.

Parks don't belong to any one group. I would have preferred that they camped out in bank lobbies since after all, they now owned them in part also.

[Gtownoe]

Originally Posted by pghquest

The Boston Tea Party was protesting the EXACT OPPOSITE of what Occupy wants, which is why the Occupy movement is a complete joke and always will be.

Was it not about money and control?

[lionsgators]

Originally Posted by Gtownoe

Was it not about money and control?

no. it was about unemployed people not showering and costing the taxpayers lots of money.

[pghquest]

Originally Posted by pknopp

Occupy argued just like the Tea Party against the bail out of the banks. Basically that is the same complaint the founders had. Being taxed on something they did not agree with or have any real say about it.

I dont recall the Boston Tea Party (which was the discussion) having anything to do with the banks..

other than that, the occupy movement was all about government doing more, not less, which of course costs more money, thus the occupy movement was a protest FOR MORE taxes.. the complete opposite of the Boston Tea Party protests who wanted left alone.