Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-19-2013, 10:43 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,017,439 times
Reputation: 5455

Advertisements

Of course it will all have to be replaced costing even more.

“We’re making history doing what we’re doing here,” said Maj. Gen. Kurt J. Stein, head of the 1st Sustainment Command, who is overseeing the drawdown in Afghanistan. “This is the largest retrograde mission in history.”

Scrapping equipment key to Afghan drawdown - The Washington Post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2013, 11:12 PM
 
Location: Northern CA
12,770 posts, read 11,570,059 times
Reputation: 4262
Unbelievable!


Quote:
In another section of the scrap yard, a massive grinder gobbled slabs of steel, turning them into small scraps. The debris is packed into U.S.-owned shipping containers that also have been deemed unfit to return home.
Last month, the Kandahar yard produced 11 million pounds of scrap that was sold to Afghan contractors for a few cents per pound, said Morgan Gunn, a Defense Logistics Agency employee who runs the site. Afghans use the scrap mainly for construction and as makeshift spare parts.

“Gold dust is what they call it,” Gunn said.
Reminds me of those ads Hollywood is running now about wanting to get rid of America's nukes. We have no idea how many we have, no inspections have ever been done in US or Israel, but it sounds good to lighten up - until you start thinking about what that entails. Where are you going to bury hundreds if not thousands of nukes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2013, 03:01 AM
 
3,846 posts, read 2,385,849 times
Reputation: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper View Post
Unbelievable!

Reminds me of those ads Hollywood is running now about wanting to get rid of America's nukes. We have no idea how many we have, no inspections have ever been done in US or Israel, but it sounds good to lighten up - until you start thinking about what that entails. Where are you going to bury hundreds if not thousands of nukes?
Store them in the basement of the White House, where else?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2013, 03:11 AM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,650,795 times
Reputation: 9676
Goes to show you that war makes a lot of money for the greed heads!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2013, 03:11 AM
 
5,150 posts, read 7,767,541 times
Reputation: 1443
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
Of course it will all have to be replaced costing even more.

“We’re making history doing what we’re doing here,” said Maj. Gen. Kurt J. Stein, head of the 1st Sustainment Command, who is overseeing the drawdown in Afghanistan. “This is the largest retrograde mission in history.”

Scrapping equipment key to Afghan drawdown - The Washington Post
A few thoughts:

1) They should have joined Amazon Prime

2) How much do you think those contractors are getting paid?

3) We've now told the Taliban and when we are leaving and that we'll destroy more than 200 million pounds of gear.

4) If we need to change our mind and send troops back in we'll be missing some stuff.

So, it looks like goodbye for sure but what if something goes wrong? I am glad we're not donating much to the Afghans since a small group of their army like to kill us. Best if it isn't with our gear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2013, 05:12 AM
 
Location: USA
6,230 posts, read 6,926,002 times
Reputation: 10784
It's generally cheaper to buy new stock than retrieve and return.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2013, 05:51 AM
 
4,130 posts, read 4,462,376 times
Reputation: 3046
You are really angry that the US is not shipping back broken and unusable garbage?

Do you write these posts surrounded by sacks of garbage in a hoarder house?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2013, 05:52 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
Of course it will all have to be replaced costing even more.

“We’re making history doing what we’re doing here,” said Maj. Gen. Kurt J. Stein, head of the 1st Sustainment Command, who is overseeing the drawdown in Afghanistan. “This is the largest retrograde mission in history.”

Scrapping equipment key to Afghan drawdown - The Washington Post
Too bad there are no oceans, or we could dump it in the water, like we did in Vietnam. Some gear has been there for over 10 years, and makes no sense to ship it back and try to refurbish it. It actually saves money to scrap it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2013, 06:58 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,554,711 times
Reputation: 24780
Default Seven billion dollars worth of equipment scrapped in Afghan pullout

Yep.

Dubya should have had us out of there in 2005.

Instead, he started that stupid war in Iraq because Cheney told him would be a good thing to do.

We left billions in equipment there, too.

In the past 60 years, the military industrial complex always wins every war, and the American taxpayer always loses. Ike warned us. We wouldn't listen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2013, 07:57 AM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,330,060 times
Reputation: 5480
Quote:
Originally Posted by s1alker View Post
It's generally cheaper to buy new stock than retrieve and return.
correct it costs alot to fly out old Vehicles temp housing and gear that is used up and bit would cost more in jet fuel to fly it out since Pakistan will not let us use a convoy of trucks to move it through a Pakistan port and load it onto cargo ships.

So we have to fly it out with many loads using our fleet of heavy lift cargo planes and Russia is letting us fly in their airspace and land on their runways to a central spot at a Russian Airfield to be a temp Airbase that we will use to fly it out of and organize the co-ordinate the Airlifts so we make sure we keep everything together that is supposed to be together and not have a massive mess of stuff to sort out back here.

Since it is a 2-3 leg journey and we would getting our stuff out of Afghanistan ASAP then tearing it packing it up better in Russia to make the final legs of the trip and fly Right across Russia and then hop over to Alaska and unload.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top