Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-17-2013, 11:00 PM
 
93 posts, read 82,980 times
Reputation: 45

Advertisements

This guy is awesome. Straight forward, give me the facts no civil rights violations here. He even considered the timeline of the time TM got off the phone with Jeantel and GZ being at the T. In either case TM had to approach GZ for the confrontation to commence. I am e54. I am GZ. Silly but I am TM definitely sounds dumb.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-17-2013, 11:04 PM
 
Location: California
4,400 posts, read 13,395,534 times
Reputation: 3162
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
What a stupid thread premise.
Why?

The alternate jurors would have sat in the jury box and would have heard all the evidence...BUT they would not have been in the jury room and would not have been part of the deliberations...meaning no opportunity for other juror's opinions to alter theirs...which is what is supposed to happen.

So, the opinion of someone who sat there the whole time, for every minute, is in fact interesting.

What a stupid thread post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2013, 11:43 PM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,673,869 times
Reputation: 9174
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebunny View Post
Ummmm...this was an ALTERNATE...you know, the ones who don't get to vote and are not part of the deliberations. So, yeah, kind of matters.

My advice...read the entire post and understand it before you are snarky. Generally results in you looking better.
I guess it wasn't obvious that all the voting jurors were unanimous: Not Guilty!

So no, it kinda doesn't matter at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2013, 05:27 PM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,037,907 times
Reputation: 3603
That is 7 now that would give a Not Guilty verdict. Quite the contrast from the juror who went on CNN. Stuck with the evidence. And we told all you goofs that the States closing arguments were proof they knew they had no case. It was all about emotion. They literally were counting on the jury to issue a verdict just off emotion, and not evidence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top