Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
As usual, you are in desperate search of a clue. Sexual orientation is not a choice, but if it gives you satisfaction, in order to rationalize and justify your one going misguided homophobia so be it. Sadly, some blacks folks need someone they can dump on, regardless of whether they have any justification for it, doesn't seem to matter to them. You don't know what lust is? Really? Too bad. As I mentioned your in desperate search of a clue, or perhaps how you would put it, in search of a hypothesis. Homophobia has always been directly related to lack of education, which you exhibit with virtually every post.
No, homophobia is not because of lack of education. It's simply people exhibiting their preference and the LGBT crowd slapping the "phobia" on the end of it.
This is what the LGBT community LOVES to do....pass peoples opinions off as "lack of education" but they are really conflating education with propaganda. "Tolerance" (another word abused by the LGBT community) is not taught by means of "education" only by propaganda. That's it...
No, homophobia is not because of lack of education. It's simply people exhibiting their preference.
This is what the LGBT community LOVES to do....pass peoples opinions off as "lack of education" but they are really conflating education with propaganda. "Tolerance" (another word abused by the LGBT community) is not taught by means of "education" only propaganda. That's it...
It's their preference to exhibit hate. It's their preference to be intolerant. You think people should be hated on, because they have the right to hate. People have the right to hate people who are left handed, right? People have the right to hate people who have blue eyes. Real genius.
No, homophobia is not because of lack of education. It's simply people exhibiting their preference and the LGBT crowd slapping the "phobia" on the end of it.
This is what the LGBT community LOVES to do....pass peoples opinions off as "lack of education" but they are really conflating education with propaganda. "Tolerance" (another word abused by the LGBT community) is not taught by means of "education" only by propaganda. That's it...
Wrong. Homophobia is a catch-all word for people who have any number of various issues - a love of scapegoating, fear of others, inability to think rationally, religious obsession, a lack of an educated mind, etc. concerning gay individuals.
It's their preference to exhibit hate. It's their preference to be intolerant. You think people should be hated on, because they have the right to hate. People have the right to hate people who are left handed, right? People have the right to hate people who have blue eyes. Real genius.
Yes, people should have a right to hate. People should have the right to live in societies with norms conducive to their happiness. Civil societies have these norms as unwritten rules, when people like to subvert them...people get upset. It's a much better and much more logical alternative than forcing associations....or using a dogmatic approach like "LOOK, EVERYBODY IS HUMAN"..Yes, everybody is human but that is about where the comparison ends and humans have yet to make an argument as to why this is enough to join everybody at the hip.
Wrong. Homophobia is a catch-all word for people who have any number of various issues - a love of scapegoating, fear of others, inability to think rationally, religious obsession, a lack of an educated mind, etc. concerning gay individuals.
Yes, and another word for "catch-all" is generalization.
And it's so ironic that you are using one to house the characterization of "lacking an educated mind" LMAO
That's disgraceful that you would describe a hetero sexual in such a manner...as if they were a worm....the "scared little homophobe?" better get one thing correct no intelligent straight man is "scared" of gays...or phobic or fearful - Some simply find them unpleasant and irritating ...just like you find the "scared little homophobe" irritating...We all have rights to think what we want.
Or maybe it's part of the guilt trip and self-hate you experience, since most hetero men have the mentality of a rapist. Straight men fantasy about such things. They imagine ways of getting away with it; and for centuries they did. Straight men coerce women into having sex, and if they can find a way to make them submit, they don't consider that rape. Sometimes they do it with money, dinner, gifts, security, it's all a trade off. Women will submit, only if they can obtain something in return, but most often a woman does not feel the same lust for a man, that the man does for a woman. Straight men have good reason to feel guilt. And often make babies along the way, and forget them. Or make babies they can't financially support.
Yes, people should have a right to hate. People should have the right to live in societies with norms conducive to their happiness. Civil societies have these norms as unwritten rules, when people like to subvert them...people get upset. It's a much better and much more logical alternative than forcing associations....or using a dogmatic approach like "LOOK, EVERYBODY IS HUMAN"..Yes, everybody is human but that is about where the comparison ends and humans have yet to make an argument as to why this is enough to join everybody at the hip.
People that hate gays get a payoff. They get to feel superior and improve their incredibly low self-esteem.
People that hate gays get a payoff. They get to feel superior and improve their incredibly low self-esteem.
Mmmhmmm...well, if sexual orientation IS, in fact, genetic and involuntary....then heterosexuals ARE superior for a very simple biological reason. No need for artificial boosts.
I don't even know what that means. A persuasive (appeal to the emotions) rather than logical (appeal to reason) argument?
Quote:
Sexual orientation is not a choice, but if it gives you satisfaction, in order to rationalize and justify your one going misguided homophobia so be it.
I never said sexual orientation was a choice. I don't think it is a choice. By choice I mean one taking time to deliberate about what they will be attracted to. And pedophilia is not a choice either. That does not mean one can not change the way one thinks. Whether that be cues that infuriate a racist person, or cues that send immediate physical and psychological cravings into an addict. For example, many crack addicts when they get money in their hands (paycheck or someone giving them money) immediately go through physical responses. Their stomachs turn and they are overwhelmed with the need to defecate. They go through a lot more physical and psychological roller coasters so to speak, that makes not going to buy and use crack nearly impossible. However, there is a possibility to change and to change the thoughts one associates with money in their hands/pockets.
You even pointed this out when you stated there are male porn stars that are gay-for-pay if they get rid of their homophobia (change their thinking) then they can have sex with men.
Quote:
Sadly, some blacks folks need someone they can dump on, regardless of whether they have any justification for it, doesn't seem to matter to them. You don't know what lust is? Really? Too bad. As I mentioned your in desperate search of a clue, or perhaps how you would put it, in search of a hypothesis. Homophobia has always been directly related to lack of education, which you exhibit with virtually every post.
My major is biology.
I like how when an English major or a 12 year old child or high school dropout parrots the view people are either born heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual (from conception) then these people are "educated."
Chemistry and physics (determinist sciences) is what drives biological organisms, to that extent biological organisms like humans have deterministic characteristics to them at the cellular level. The "mind" to my understanding is not one and the same as the brain and there is controversy over to what extent if any determinism can be applied to the "mind."
But getting back to "education" and the deterministic nature of sexual orientation with respects to the chemical structure of DNA and nerve cells. The terms "phobic" and "philic" are used in the sciences and they are contradictory chemical responses. So, if I'm homo-phobic what would be the deterministic contradiction of that, "homo-philic"?
If a man is homo-philic then one can infer from that that he likes other men's penises dangling around his head. Either way, homo-phobic and homo-philic would be deterministic characteristics. So, a heterosexual that is not homo-phobic must like other men's penises dangling around his face.
Just saying.
At any rate... I'm not homophobic. Not what's implied by that psychologically. I just don't subscribe to the view that people are born homosexual or heterosexual or that people's sexual attractions (to whatever morphology or phenotype) can not change--for whatever reason--over time.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
