Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-08-2013, 08:26 AM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,600,621 times
Reputation: 2823

Advertisements

They may have some difficulty imposing that on people that have a lease that doesn't contain that restriction. It nay be hard to retroactively impose a restriction on a legal behavior. I don't know how many people would actually challenge it though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-08-2013, 08:26 AM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,798,305 times
Reputation: 4174
This is actually legal. For new leases, anyway.

It's just a bad idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 08:27 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,597 posts, read 17,283,784 times
Reputation: 17646
Free market only for liberal causes.

Try to restrict residency for any other reason and see what happens.
Try to evict and see what happens.

How about that caterer in VT that refused to cater a wedding?

Now you have a guy in business of renting who refuses right to 2nd ammendment and legal possession ?

Sounds like a denial of right to keep and bear.

Now that career criminals don't have to mention past transgressions to protect their rights.

Gang members so prolific in CO will mark that building on their map of target rich environments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 08:28 AM
 
78,581 posts, read 60,785,925 times
Reputation: 49895
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
Private entity. They can pick and choose if they can have guns or not in their building
I don't see anyone arguing that they have to right to do this, just that it may (or may not) be a good business decision.

It would be interesting to learn what the actual motivation is behind the decision.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 08:30 AM
 
Location: Portland, OR
8,802 posts, read 8,910,290 times
Reputation: 4512
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
Free market, isn't it.
But us free marketers believe in the power of courts and contracts over regulations. Until its written into the lease agreement, that management company is on the wrong side of a law suit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 08:31 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,237,820 times
Reputation: 9895
Probably not a good business decision, but it is perfectly legal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 08:32 AM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,798,305 times
Reputation: 4174
Shouldn't be long before someone puts together a big sign saying:

----------------------------------------

Everyone in this building is guaranteed to be disarmed, by direction of the building owner.

Burglars, thieves, rapists, and murderers, please do not attack or hurt the people in this building.

Not because they can do anything to stop you, but because we asked nicely. Please?

-------------------------------------

...and puts it up on that building, snaps a few photos for the internet, then takes down the sign and runs like hell before the residents get him for the crime of telling the truth.

Any volunteers?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 08:35 AM
 
Location: A great city, by a Great Lake!
15,896 posts, read 12,007,935 times
Reputation: 7502
It's their property, and their rules, but very stupid in my opinion. They may as well put up a sign inviting criminals to come and rob their residents. I sure as Hell wouldn't live there!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 08:36 AM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,714 posts, read 31,215,964 times
Reputation: 9270
I have doubts that for the term of an existing lease that they can do this. But I don't know renters laws in Colorado. I can see it being required for new leases or renewed leases.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 08:36 AM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,798,305 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by no1brownsfan View Post
They may as well put up a sign inviting criminals to come and rob their residents.
Now why didn't I think of that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top