Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-08-2013, 04:14 PM
 
8,483 posts, read 6,942,403 times
Reputation: 1119

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmmjv View Post
Tossed them how?? How in God's name was one person ever left alone with ballots? I've worked at the polls several times, usually as a warden, and I never had ballots thrown away. It doesn't matter if they're volunteers or if it's informal. You don't have to have a PhD in ballots to know that you don't throw them away
Can't argue that. Just telling you what I have seen reports of and video. Ballots being tossed doesn't appear to be uncommon. Don't have to be alone either. In that link with doc I posted, I believe more than one was tossing them. They just take the trash bag and dump it with the trash.
Think this is it.
From here.
//www.city-data.com/forum/elections/1527342-goldman-sachs-us-election-investment.html


Hacking Democracy - Full Length - YouTube

Interesting that this has been blocked since I posted it. Bound to be other copies.

Last edited by CDusr; 09-08-2013 at 04:23 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-08-2013, 04:26 PM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,470,259 times
Reputation: 3142
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Oh, please, if voter fraud were so prevalent and so massive, you'd actually have reports of election outcomes being affected. You have no proof that there is a problem.

And your silly photo ID doesn't even address where most voter fraud is likely to happen, ABSENTEE ballots.

So, if you're supporting legislation to address a non-existent problem, and the legislation doesn't even address where the non-existent problem is most likely to occur, then what exactly is the legislation supposed to do?
It's supposed to ensure that the people voting are who they say they are. Doesn't matter if the problem is non-existent. If one day all murder stopped, the crime of murder would still be illegal. Just because we don't have a massive amount of evidence that people are casting false ballots, doesn't mean we shouldn't ensure that people don't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2013, 04:31 PM
 
12,973 posts, read 15,821,028 times
Reputation: 5478
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidkaos2 View Post
It's supposed to ensure that the people voting are who they say they are. Doesn't matter if the problem is non-existent. If one day all murder stopped, the crime of murder would still be illegal. Just because we don't have a massive amount of evidence that people are casting false ballots, doesn't mean we shouldn't ensure that people don't.
Only two problems. It does not stop illegal votes...most of the illegal voters have photo ID.

And two it does not address absentee ballots where the vast majority of voter fraud occurs.

Si aside from mostly not working and not fixing the likely problem why do you feel it is a good thing...other than keeping poor blacks from voting that is...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2013, 04:46 PM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,470,259 times
Reputation: 3142
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Prove it.

Because EVERY SINGLE STUDY has shown that voter fraud is a minor problem (to the point of being virtually non-existent) that has NEVER impacted the outcome of an election in the United States.
It's common sense. Liberals say voter ID is suppression of the black vote. However, those same liberals defend welfare by saying that there are far more poor whites and and whites on welfare than blacks. So how is voter ID suppression of blacks if it affects more whites than blacks? The liberal contention that voter ID laws are the return of Jim Crow is pure poppycock. It doesn't follow any sort of rational thought. If something makes it harder for poor people to vote, and there are more poor whites than blacks, then that thing cannot be racist against blacks. There's simply no logic there. Secondly, where are the studies in states that do have voter ID showing massive disenfranchisement of minorities? Nowhere. All the "evidence" of voter suppression is pure speculation and conjecture no stronger than the evidence of voter fraud.

It's similar to immigration. Democrats of the past cared not at all about immigration. Harry Reid himself introduced a bill to remove birthright citizenship 20 years ago. But now the hispanic vote is key. And now suddenly we need comprehensive immigration reform because it is a vital human rights issue. And that very same Harry Reid says he refuses to let a bill come up to vote that doesn't include citizenship. It's nonsense.

Both immigration reform and voter ID are just Democrats wanting more votes and using faux outrage over nonexistent civil rights violations as a justification for a political power grab.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2013, 05:30 PM
 
12,973 posts, read 15,821,028 times
Reputation: 5478
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidkaos2 View Post
It's common sense. Liberals say voter ID is suppression of the black vote. However, those same liberals defend welfare by saying that there are far more poor whites and and whites on welfare than blacks. So how is voter ID suppression of blacks if it affects more whites than blacks? The liberal contention that voter ID laws are the return of Jim Crow is pure poppycock. It doesn't follow any sort of rational thought. If something makes it harder for poor people to vote, and there are more poor whites than blacks, then that thing cannot be racist against blacks. There's simply no logic there. Secondly, where are the studies in states that do have voter ID showing massive disenfranchisement of minorities? Nowhere. All the "evidence" of voter suppression is pure speculation and conjecture no stronger than the evidence of voter fraud.

It's similar to immigration. Democrats of the past cared not at all about immigration. Harry Reid himself introduced a bill to remove birthright citizenship 20 years ago. But now the hispanic vote is key. And now suddenly we need comprehensive immigration reform because it is a vital human rights issue. And that very same Harry Reid says he refuses to let a bill come up to vote that doesn't include citizenship. It's nonsense.

Both immigration reform and voter ID are just Democrats wanting more votes and using faux outrage over nonexistent civil rights violations as a justification for a political power grab.
Again you are trying to fix a problem that probably does not exist with a solution that does not work while leaving the only real problem alone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2013, 06:41 PM
 
Location: Lakewood OH
21,695 posts, read 28,480,003 times
Reputation: 35863
This happened right at the polls. ID's would not have mattered. The follow up to this story is that the woman pleaded guilty but was representing only herself. She was not doing this as any kind of front for the Republican party although she stated she believed she was doing them a "favor" by filling in those ballots.

Daily Kos: Clackamas County Oregon GOP ballot officials fill in GOP on blank ballots
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2013, 06:48 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,387 posts, read 26,302,134 times
Reputation: 15683
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvoc View Post
Again you are trying to fix a problem that probably does not exist with a solution that does not work while leaving the only real problem alone.
Both republican and democratic election boards have indicated the problem doesn't exist, republican legislators know better, not sure now but they know
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2013, 06:52 PM
 
Location: SW MO
23,593 posts, read 37,512,077 times
Reputation: 29337
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidkaos2 View Post
It's common sense. Liberals say voter ID is suppression of the black vote. However, those same liberals defend welfare by saying that there are far more poor whites and and whites on welfare than blacks. So how is voter ID suppression of blacks if it affects more whites than blacks? The liberal contention that voter ID laws are the return of Jim Crow is pure poppycock. It doesn't follow any sort of rational thought. If something makes it harder for poor people to vote, and there are more poor whites than blacks, then that thing cannot be racist against blacks. There's simply no logic there. Secondly, where are the studies in states that do have voter ID showing massive disenfranchisement of minorities? Nowhere. All the "evidence" of voter suppression is pure speculation and conjecture no stronger than the evidence of voter fraud.

It's similar to immigration. Democrats of the past cared not at all about immigration. Harry Reid himself introduced a bill to remove birthright citizenship 20 years ago. But now the hispanic vote is key. And now suddenly we need comprehensive immigration reform because it is a vital human rights issue. And that very same Harry Reid says he refuses to let a bill come up to vote that doesn't include citizenship. It's nonsense.

Both immigration reform and voter ID are just Democrats wanting more votes and using faux outrage over nonexistent civil rights violations as a justification for a political power grab.
Psst. You're talking liberals here. Rational thought is non-applicable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2013, 06:59 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,387 posts, read 26,302,134 times
Reputation: 15683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curmudgeon View Post
Psst. You're talking liberals here. Rational thought is non-applicable.
Yes, some like to see facts behind a new change in voting laws that have been on the books since decades, talk about rational thought
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2013, 07:18 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,701,078 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Draper View Post
She voted with absentee ballots, how would requiring an ID on election day make a difference.

Bad example.


Perfect example why mail-in ballots should never be an acceptable way to vote.
The door is wide open for corruption from the most powerful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top