Muslim Brotherhood Member Gets Senior DHS Advisory Position (military, terrorists, federal government)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Then by all means feel free to refute the topic in the OP with whatever you consider to be a reliable source and tell us who originally made up the list of canned responses that Obama supporters use like clockwork in every thread. I'll wait.
Being written by World Nut Daily is all the refutation is needed. The owner of World Nut Daily even says the admitedly post misinformation. And more to World Nut Dailys discredit: They often edit/update articles without making mention of the edit. Post articles that have outright lies in them, without FACT checking anything of it.
And Joseph Farrah's response when called out on the apparent misinformation and false allegations, and when articles get update, that he/they do not make that correction noted, in the articles posted to his site: He calls people worms.
Quote:
Unfortunately for Cashill the supposed “genuine” image — the one without Obama — was itself a sloppy photoshop job that still included part of Obama’s knee between his grandparents. This was pointed out by Media Matters about eight hours after Cashill’s column was published on WND.
At that point WND simply scrubbed the first two paragraphs of the story, without so much as an update, let alone a correction. These lines were now gone:
In his definitive 2010 biography of Barack Obama, “The Bridge,” New Yorker editor David Remnick features a photograph of a dapper young Barack Obama sitting between his grandparents on a Central Park bench.
The bench is real. The grandparents are real. The wall behind them is real. Barack Obama is not. He has been conspicuously photo-shopped in. Who did this and why remains as much a mystery as Obama’s extended stay in New York.
When I pointed this out, Farah fired back (emphasis added):
Jack Cashill is an OPINION columnist. Admittedly, we publish some misinformation by columnists, as does your publication and every other journal that contains opinion. Bill Press seldom gets anything right in his column, but because we believe in providing the broadest spectrum of OPINION anywhere in the news business, we tolerate that kind of thing. Yes, Cashill’s column contained an egregious error, which we corrected almost immediately, which is far more than I expect you to do in what I assume is a NEWS piece you wrote.
I asked Farah if it is standard practice at WND to remove major sections of stories without any correction. To which he responded:
How long have you been in this business, punk? My guess is you were in diapers when I was running major metropolitan newspapers. You call what you wrote a news story? You aren’t fit to carry Chelsea Schilling’s laptop.
1. The source isn't valid
2. That's racist
3. GOP obstruction
4. But...but...but George W. Bush
5. Haters gonna hate
6. Sour grapes- your guy lost
7. Repeat 1,2,3,4,5 and/or 6 as needed then insult the opposition for failing to support this great man, declare victory, and move on
So exactly which part of the story are you questioning? Is it that the person in question has received the position in the Federal Government or that he's a Muslim Brotherhood member? Elaborate and list some news outlets that you consider reliable and maybe we can find some information from those sources.
Thanks
No just wondering how the NY Times and Daily News missed out on this big news story, souring the internet until you find some fiction that meets your needs, waste of time. Not going to give credibility to ridiculous statements by debating.
Yes i must agree the WDN has the IQ of 20 but it's too bad the entire Obama Admin rates a 3 combined. Obama couldn't toast a marshmallow if you handed it to him on a stick.
Oh, they are much more than 3 seeing as they have ignored World Nut daily and their birther tripe and baiting for 7 years.
typical Rick Roma response; post a list of stolen arguments (since we know he didn't come up with all by his lonesome) without credit, that has nothing to do with the topic.
and World Nut Daily is not a credible news source. Everyone with an IQ over 20 knows this.
And everyone with an IQ between 10 and 20 knows that ad hominem is a rabid liberal's last gasp when they have nothing relevant to say, no cogent argument and just can't stand to shut the hell up.
Being written by World Nut Daily is all the refutation is needed. The owner of World Nut Daily even says the admitedly post misinformation. And more to World Nut Dailys discredit: They often edit/update articles without making mention of the edit. Post articles that have outright lies in them, without FACT checking anything of it.
And Joseph Farrah's response when called out on the apparent misinformation and false allegations, and when articles get update, that he/they do not make that correction noted, in the articles posted to his site: He calls people worms.
So in other words you've got nothing and you can't refute the topic of the OP. You also can't seem to find who purportedly originated the list of canned Obot responses. Thanks for that.
This documents his position within the Federal Government:
No just wondering how the NY Times and Daily News missed out on this big news story, souring the internet until you find some fiction that meets your needs, waste of time. Not going to give credibility to ridiculous statements by debating.
In case you haven't heard this the media tends to go out of their way to not report negative news regarding Obama.
So in other words you've got nothing and you can't refute the topic of the OP. You also can't seem to find who purportedly originated the list of canned Obot responses. Thanks for that.
so you can't refute that Joseph Farrah, the OWNER of World Nut Daily, admits that they knowingly post false information by their contributors. Makes corrections and updates without acknowledging their original content was wrong (known as SCRUBBING) and will delete articles as if they weren't there in the fist place, and when POINTED out that these things happen, he calls those PEOPLE worms??
That's the credibility of the SITE you wish to use as your source.
Quote:
Here's a link to his Twitter page which displays the R4BIA symbol:
So what else have you got? Will you come up with something or will you keep on with the lame old Obot tactic of shooting the messenger?
and what is exactly wrong with that symbol? Oh yeah, because a certain group uses it, you denounce the use of it by anyone else and think that they have ties to these groups. As it was used by the group that ousted the Military regime that ruled Egypt.
Funny, the same thing was said about the US FLAG... we were the rebels, our symbol of freedom ripped from the British Flag. We fought for our freedoms; by your standards, then all us AMERCIANS are terrorists.
So in other words you've got nothing and you can't refute the topic of the OP. You also can't seem to find who purportedly originated the list of canned Obot responses. Thanks for that.
This documents his position within the Federal Government:
So what else have you got? Will you come up with something or will you keep on with the lame old Obot tactic of shooting the messenger?
Are you seriously implying that anyoine displaying that symbol is a "Muslim Brotherhood Member" - hell, even WND, that fount of misinformation, only called him a "backer".
Of course, to many, that symbol is simply to commemorate the Aug 14th massacre, which - even though Mursi is an a-hole - I take it we agree isn't the way regime change should be handled? Incidentally, there seems to be several organizations that compete over the symbol - you could try this link instead:
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
