Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-26-2013, 05:58 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,771,097 times
Reputation: 6856

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by aneftp View Post
Pretty simple:

Pass funding of the ACA the way it was passed. That means no special exemptions for congressional staffers and force them onto the federal exchange. Those staffers making more than 400% of poverty get no subsides.

Force the employer mandate.

What's Obama and the Dems going to do than? Veto their own bill?

I don't know why this is so hard to think about it. Force Obama and the Dems hands. They cannot go to the American public and reject their own bill they have been praising the past 3 plus years.

Who would look like the idiot than?
PolitiFact | Sen. Ted Cruz says Obama 'just granted all of Congress an exception' to Obamacare
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-26-2013, 07:14 PM
 
3,599 posts, read 6,783,818 times
Reputation: 1461
Surprised no one is also talking about forcing the employer mandate as well.

Either force the employer mandate if the individual mandate is being forced. Or leave them both out. It's not one or the order.

You can tie Obama and the Senate Democrats hands easy with this funding by adding this provision. Actually the republicans would be throwing the employer mandate right back at the Senate dems face and let them have their choice. Tell them they got funding for the ACA with both the employer mandate and individual mandate in place. That's the way the bill was written and passed by the Democrats.

What choice would the Dems have than? They have to pass their own bill to fund it. They can't just say...but but but employer mandate should be delayed. If employer mandate is delayed than individual mandate should be delayed as well.

Dems are in a catch 22 position. This is a much better way to bring about a government shutdown or a debt default. If their is a shutdown or default. Republicans have coverered their ground. They will simply tell the American public they passed funding for the ACA the way it was passed in 2010. They are trying to move the country forward with full funding of the law the way it was written.

Dems would have no choice but to go along with the employer mandate effective in 2014. This would cause complete havoc to employers. And let the finger pointing begin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2013, 07:17 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,783,616 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by aneftp View Post
Pretty simple:

Pass funding of the ACA the way it was passed. That means no special exemptions for congressional staffers and force them onto the federal exchange. Those staffers making more than 400% of poverty get no subsides.

Force the employer mandate.

What's Obama and the Dems going to do than? Veto their own bill?

I don't know why this is so hard to think about it. Force Obama and the Dems hands. They cannot go to the American public and reject their own bill they have been praising the past 3 plus years.

Who would look like the idiot than?
Obama is already ignoring parts of the bill the Congress passed and he signed into law. He's delaying various mandates, exempting people the law says he can't exempt, etc.

What makes you think that passing more laws telling him he can't do it, will do any good?

Just as gun control laws can't control people (criminals) who don't obey the law, Obamacare laws won't control the Democrats if they want to ignore or change them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2013, 07:34 PM
 
5,064 posts, read 5,729,580 times
Reputation: 4770
I would love to see Obama and the Dems have to live with the consequences of this terrible law, but the problem is it won't be them getting hurt. At least not in the form of losing jobs, struggling to support their families, dealing with terrible health care. That will be regular, every day Americans. And once it starts, it will be terribly hard to unwind, and even more people will get hurt in that process.
It would be much better for people if this law was repealed now, before things really get painful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2013, 07:37 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,670,280 times
Reputation: 7943
You right-wingers are certainly going berserk over this, aren't you….

Keep it up. I guess I'd rather see you waste your time and energy on a futile attempt to repeal Obamacare than to actually do something that matters. lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2013, 08:22 PM
 
3,599 posts, read 6,783,818 times
Reputation: 1461
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
You right-wingers are certainly going berserk over this, aren't you….

Keep it up. I guess I'd rather see you waste your time and energy on a futile attempt to repeal Obamacare than to actually do something that matters. lol
First of all most of us republicans aren't "right wingers". I am a fiscal conservative.

I am not in favor of defunding the ACA. I want the law implemented the way it was passed. For the American people to see for themselves how wonderful the law is.

Why delay the employer mandate but refuse to delay the individual mandate? Ask your self why Obama gets to cherry pick what he wants? The law is law as Dems say. Right? The law says the individual and employer mandate takes effect 2014? Right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 04:17 PM
 
46,961 posts, read 25,990,037 times
Reputation: 29448
Quote:
Originally Posted by aneftp View Post
Surprised no one is also talking about forcing the employer mandate as well.
Surprised you're not commenting on the absence of "special exemptions congressional staffers" now that you've been carefully shown that they don't exist.

Sorry, typo. That should have been "Not surprised". Because I am not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 04:40 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
Surprised you're not commenting on the absence of "special exemptions congressional staffers" now that you've been carefully shown that they don't exist.

Sorry, typo. That should have been "Not surprised". Because I am not.
Then why did Harry Reid say a few weeks ago that they were?

Harry Reid: Congress’s ObamaCare exemption is “what the law says,” sorry I’m not sorry « Hot Air
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 05:12 PM
 
46,961 posts, read 25,990,037 times
Reputation: 29448
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Ehm - he didn't. Well, not in that piece, anyway. This would be because there aren't any. And because HotAir is trying to deliberately mislead you, of course.

Congresspeople and their staff are being removed from their Federal health insurance plan and have to purchase insurance on the exchanges. Section 1312 of the ACA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 05:22 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,897,671 times
Reputation: 14125
After reading this thread, I realized something. At least I am the only one noticing it is bass-ackwards to have the employer mandate pushed back but not the individual mandate. That is the worst attack on mainstreet since the stimulus. good luck trying to be the party for the people in 2014 and going forward Dems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top