Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-02-2013, 02:29 PM
 
2,538 posts, read 4,712,979 times
Reputation: 3357

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by evilnewbie View Post
I think it is funny that you oppose black and white, and yet your argument is exactly black and white... Separating those who oppose your view... It is not as simple as you think...
It has nothing to do with "oppose your view". I'm talking about hypocrites, pure and simple. You can not claim to be a champion of the law and then willfully break or ignore it when it doesn't suit you. That is very definition of hypocrisy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-02-2013, 02:30 PM
 
4,739 posts, read 10,445,095 times
Reputation: 4192
"Law" and "Morality" are not always the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2013, 02:30 PM
 
Location: Central Florida
362 posts, read 560,114 times
Reputation: 677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redraven View Post
I think it is a normal part of "the human condition".
the next time you drive or walk through your town, pay close attention to the people and the vehicles.
How many "jaywalkers" do you see? (Crossing the street other than in a crosswalk is illegal almost everywhere!)
How many vehicles do you see that don't come to a complete stop at a stop sign?
How many vehicles actually STOP before making a "right turn on red" at a controlled intersection?
How many times do you see the light turn red before a vehicle clears the intersection?
How many times do you see somebody talking on a cell phone while driving, even though it is illegal?
How often do you see people make a turn without any kind of signal?

But, then we have things like the current PSAs against "distracted driving", that tell us that "Distracted driving is anything that takes your eyes off the road ahead, or your hand(s) off the steering wheel!"
SO, it is apparently illegal to look at the rear view mirror, or the speedometer. It is illegal to adjust the radio volume. Or the heater controls. Of course, the greatest distraction for drivers in the world MUST be illegal: KIDS in the BACK SEAT!
There is a very good reason so many don't pay attention to "the rule of law"! That rule is so often ridiculous!
Does it also make it illegal for law enforcement officers to use their in-car computer to run your license plate, then take the information from the plate and run your driver's license... How many times did they take their eyes off the road for that?

As a former LEO I think the driving distracted thing is misdirected. My time was before gps, and in-car computers. I drove pretty freaking distracted, writing down the address to my destination while reading a map of a subdivision to find the street, usually at a pretty high rate of speed. Never hit a thing.

As to the OP's question. There is no black and white in law, there is no natural law, there will always be exceptions to the rule. Which is why due process must be followed whenever someone violates the written rule.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2013, 02:43 PM
 
2,538 posts, read 4,712,979 times
Reputation: 3357
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLgirl727 View Post
Does it also make it illegal for law enforcement officers to use their in-car computer to run your license plate, then take the information from the plate and run your driver's license... How many times did they take their eyes off the road for that?

As a former LEO I think the driving distracted thing is misdirected. My time was before gps, and in-car computers. I drove pretty freaking distracted, writing down the address to my destination while reading a map of a subdivision to find the street, usually at a pretty high rate of speed. Never hit a thing.

As to the OP's question. There is no black and white in law, there is no natural law, there will always be exceptions to the rule. Which is why due process must be followed whenever someone violates the written rule.
I'm not sure what you're getting at, as I tend to agree with you. My problem is with people who willfully break the law out of convenience or sometime spite. I'm also not talking about fairly trivial stuff like talking on a hand held phone or j-walking. I'm more concerned by serious stuff, like high level tax evasion, fraud, or in some cases crimes as bad a drug trafficking or murder. Think of some one like Ollie North and some of his ilk. They committed serious crimes and not just in the name of "patriotism" either. Yet these same people proclaimed themselves to be the ultimate defenders of the American way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2013, 03:00 PM
 
Location: Central Florida
362 posts, read 560,114 times
Reputation: 677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Velvet Jones View Post
I'm not sure what you're getting at, as I tend to agree with you. My problem is with people who willfully break the law out of convenience or sometime spite. I'm also not talking about fairly trivial stuff like talking on a hand held phone or j-walking. I'm more concerned by serious stuff, like high level tax evasion, fraud, or in some cases crimes as bad a drug trafficking or murder. Think of some one like Ollie North and some of his ilk. They committed serious crimes and not just in the name of "patriotism" either. Yet these same people proclaimed themselves to be the ultimate defenders of the American way.
What I am getting at is that the more rules (laws) written, the more people you have violating them, including the "good guys".

We are all human, I think it's becoming almost impossible to stay within the lines of all these laws being enacted by our government. Have you ever sat down and read a state statute book, cover to cover, to read all those rules? It's enlightening, I highly recommend it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2013, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Columbus, OH
3,038 posts, read 2,514,238 times
Reputation: 831
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLgirl727 View Post
Does it also make it illegal for law enforcement officers to use their in-car computer to run your license plate, then take the information from the plate and run your driver's license... How many times did they take their eyes off the road for that?

As a former LEO I think the driving distracted thing is misdirected. My time was before gps, and in-car computers. I drove pretty freaking distracted, writing down the address to my destination while reading a map of a subdivision to find the street, usually at a pretty high rate of speed. Never hit a thing.

As to the OP's question. There is no black and white in law, there is no natural law, there will always be exceptions to the rule. Which is why due process must be followed whenever someone violates the written rule.
This has always bothered me. I'm not allowed to do certain things when driving but a police officer has special magical powers that he won't be distracted doing more? Why should an officer be able to write me a ticket for something he does all the time? Shouldn't he be held to the same standard as me?

The largest cause of death for a cop is car accident. I wonder how many civilians are killed by distracted driving police officers. Doubt the government has ever bothered to find out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2013, 03:27 PM
 
Location: The Bowery
46 posts, read 55,712 times
Reputation: 29
The law exist for many reason to keep people safe, not have their rights intruded on and other protections. It can also be self serving to certain groups, bias and subjugate people.

Especially when line between laws and morals become bedfellows and things go crazy from there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2013, 05:32 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,222,338 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Velvet Jones View Post
Awww, did I strike a nerve?
No. Do you disagree with what I said and if so, how?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2013, 05:35 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,222,338 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioRules View Post
This has always bothered me. I'm not allowed to do certain things when driving but a police officer has special magical powers that he won't be distracted doing more? Why should an officer be able to write me a ticket for something he does all the time? Shouldn't he be held to the same standard as me?
There are a few weak arguments for allowing police officers to use cell phones while driving but when the law was passed against driving and talking on your cell phone here, excluding police officers did not go over very well. Many argued that if it's unsafe, it's unsafe, period.

The police force are going to hands free phones but yeah, don't tell me it's unsafe for me but not you.

P.S. My car is already equipped hands free.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2013, 05:44 PM
 
Location: Just transplanted to FL from the N GA mountains
3,997 posts, read 4,144,523 times
Reputation: 2677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Velvet Jones View Post
It has nothing to do with "oppose your view". I'm talking about hypocrites, pure and simple. You can not claim to be a champion of the law and then willfully break or ignore it when it doesn't suit you. That is very definition of hypocrisy.
While we all are probably law-breakers (and thus hypocrites) to some extent... You've got to ask the larger question?

Which is worse? Me, not putting MY seatbelt on (and endangering MY live) or someone driving drunk and endangering YOURS?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top