Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-19-2013, 05:48 PM
 
Location: Itinerant
8,278 posts, read 6,276,391 times
Reputation: 6681

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Define "bear arms"
As it is defined by the constitution.
Carry, support, endure, turn or proceed.

Would you like me to define keep too...?
To have or retain possession of
to continue or cause to continue in a specified condition, position, course, etc.
Provide sustenance of
To Honor or fulfill
To make written entries in

Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Why did it take 160 years after the US Constitution was ratified, to redefine "bear arms" and "shall not infringe."
Who is redefining it, certainly not me. However if you think the 2nd recognizes your right to use firearms, it may be you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Why was it not defined like that for 160 years, prior?
It was, in the 2nd Amendment.

However I do think you're barking up the wrong tree, I'm just pointing out that the use of arms is not protected by the second, it would be protected for use in self defense, or rights to hunt. What is protected is ownership of arms (i.e. all the combination of parts needed to have a functioning arm, so weapons and any needed ammunition, power supplies, etc. etc.)

Probably the reason that this was overlooked is that any tyrannical government who planned on subjugating a population would assume that people shooting their agents was probably a crime anyway, certainly in the eyes of those trying to subjugate, and it's far easier to outlaw the ownership of arms, than it is to expect people to not shoot someone attempting to kill them or deprive them of their liberties (i.e. kidnap, invasion of property, or depriving them of it, etc.).
__________________
My mod posts will always be in red.
The RulesInfractions & DeletionsWho's the moderator? • FAQ • What is a "Personal Attack" • What is "Trolling" • Guidelines for copyrighted material.

 
Old 11-19-2013, 05:51 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,201,197 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by hogfamily View Post
Seems whenever firearms are discussed some have to call firearm enthusiasts names such as gunnuts, gunfondelers, etc. Then there is the obligatory penis comments.

So are these people considered gunnuts, gunfondlers and penis whatever?


Meet the gunnuts

A gun hugger

Rifle lovers

Nuts for guns


And let's not forget this gunnut.






can you show us all the hoplophobes too?
 
Old 11-19-2013, 05:57 PM
 
Location: Pacific NW
9,437 posts, read 7,370,953 times
Reputation: 7979
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmqueen View Post
What's more, NO ONE in the country in her day, not even the still-young NRA, thought that every man, woman and child should be armed to the teeth so that when someone pops a screw, they could rush off to the local mall to slaughter people because "it's about freeeeeeedum!"
Prove it. Oh that's right you can't, it's just another BS made up "fact" spewed by another ignorant liberal.
 
Old 11-19-2013, 06:13 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
9,282 posts, read 6,743,397 times
Reputation: 1531
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmqueen View Post
And how does that say she wanted everyone to be armed to the teeth and consider guns as toys, as we do today, and as I said?
Pick one

Armed

Or

Unarmed

 
Old 11-19-2013, 07:41 PM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,888 posts, read 10,037,809 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmqueen View Post
Nah, the day I worry about what ignorant gun fondlers think of me will be a cold day in hell.
I guess that might matter to "ignorant gun fondlers" somewhere, unfortunately the average everyday legal gun owners here on CD already know that you're the extremely ignorant one with completely irrational fears of things you don't understand... such as firearms and self defense.
 
Old 11-19-2013, 08:19 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,364,082 times
Reputation: 7990
[quote=jmqueen;32296797]
Quote:
Originally Posted by hogfamily View Post
Seems whenever firearms are discussed some have to call firearm enthusiasts names such as gunnuts, gunfondelers, etc. Then there is the obligatory penis comments.

So are these people considered gunnuts, gunfondlers and penis whatever?

Meet the gunnuts

A gun hugger

Rifle lovers

Nuts for guns


And let's not forget this gunnut.

The woman learned to shoot in order to feed her family. She later used her skills to earn a comfortable living. She never, ever considered guns toys to be collected by the dozen and bragged about to other keyboard cowboys.

What's more, NO ONE in the country in her day, not even the still-young NRA, thought that every man, woman and child should be armed to the teeth so that when someone pops a screw, they could rush off to the local mall to slaughter people because "it's about freeeeeeedum!"
You know nothing about Annie Oakley. Do your research, then get back to us.
 
Old 11-19-2013, 08:43 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,297 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15646
Taking the words of someone almost 200 years ago to defend your opinion. Annie Oakley is the voice of reason on gun control 2013, very desperate.
 
Old 11-19-2013, 08:48 PM
 
17,468 posts, read 12,940,767 times
Reputation: 6764
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmqueen View Post
And how does that say she wanted everyone to be armed to the teeth and consider guns as toys, as we do today, and as I said?
NRA doesn't believe all people should own guns, they do believe all people should be able to own a gun.

It would help if people raised their kids properly to begin with, then they'd grow to be responsible adults.
 
Old 11-20-2013, 12:44 AM
 
Location: Anchorage Suburbanites and part time Willowbillies
1,708 posts, read 1,861,562 times
Reputation: 885
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Taking the words of someone almost 200 years ago to defend your opinion. Annie Oakley is the voice of reason on gun control 2013, very desperate.
Ummm.....Annie Oakley - August 13, 1860 – November 3, 1926. I may not be the best at math but I don't think that was 200 years ago.


I think you missed the purpose of the thread. (Annie Oakley has nothing to do with gun control....well....other than she was a really good shot.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by hogfamily View Post
Seems whenever firearms are discussed some have to call firearm enthusiasts names such as gunnuts, gunfondelers, etc. Then there is the obligatory penis comments.

So are these people considered gunnuts, gunfondlers and penis whatever?


Meet the gunnuts

A gun hugger

Rifle lovers

Nuts for guns




Last edited by hogfamily; 11-20-2013 at 01:02 AM..
 
Old 11-20-2013, 06:10 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,297 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15646
Quote:
Originally Posted by hogfamily View Post
Ummm.....Annie Oakley - August 13, 1860 – November 3, 1926. I may not be the best at math but I don't think that was 200 years ago.


I think you missed the purpose of the thread. (Annie Oakley has nothing to do with gun control....well....other than she was a really good shot.)
Quite a different place back in the 1800's and women were second citizens, I think her statements have more to do with women's rights than anyting else
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top