Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Really? So it is not the self of safety, it is not the sense of liberty and freedom and the defense of it? it is not self reliance and independence? You are aware that Colts are no long their favorite it is Glock.
Nothing more then a liberal showing us how much he does not know.
Or she - as Harrier is rather sure that Dew is.
Harrier and Dew really should meet - we live within a handful of miles of each other.
You've taken a lot of heat for this post..... but I happen to agree with you. Should a progressive seeking to disarm me show up at my door, they will be shot. It really is that simple. And to the conservatives on this thread who have thrown rocks at you, they can take their righteous indignation and shove it up their yellow-bellied, limp-wristed, pansy asses. Let them be disarmed if they can't muster the gonads to speak without hurting the feelings of a bunch of coward liberals.
Harrier can't type the words that come to mind to respond to your asinine post without violating the TOS.
True second amendment advocates(supporters of the U.S. Constitution) seek the protection of the right to bear arms (as guaranteed under the U.S Constitution).
They do not state that any person ought to be shot due to their political beliefs.
Anyone who does should be labeled as an anti-American - or a liberal - the meaning of either is the same.
Correction: If they still pushed firearms safety in school...
Firearms safety used to be taught in public schools. Nowadays, it isn't taught in schools or in an increasing number of (mainly suburban and urban) homes. And school shootings are on the rise.
You are correct. After the 1977 oil boom all the high schools built in Anchorage included an indoor gun range for the express purpose of teaching firearm safety. However, the Democrat created 1990 federal Gun Free School Zone Act ended that. There was a waste of several million dollars, thanks to congressional Democrats.
and the median state education (as seen in college grad rates and median income) might be as poor as Texas.
Again, I fully understand where the population is not highly educated, trading teaching time for guard duty time might not matter. Sadly, I include tn in that group, as we should be pushing for vast improvement far more intensely.
But there are states where education matters, and their median college graduation results prove they are getting results. These are schools, not prisons. Education is the purpose. Not promoting gun advocate's wish lists.
Someone as educated as you claim to be should know that it is a logical fallacy to place two non-mutually exclusive issues - such as guns and education - on opposites ends of a spectrum.
If your presupposition were true, there's be no such thing as a firearms instructor.
Also, a teacher, administrator, or staff member carrying a concealed weapon need not spend time conducting "guard duty" in an attempt to find or prevent potential threats; the point is that the firearm is readily accessible should the need arise.
Location: Anchorage Suburbanites and part time Willowbillies
1,708 posts, read 1,862,582 times
Reputation: 885
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch
But you overcame that deficiency by moving to Alaska.
Yes...Yes...I did!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
