Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-03-2013, 03:06 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

I feel sorry for the retirees and those close to retirement.
They worked for the city for 30+ years with the promise of a pension.

It will surely be gutted like what happened to GM retirees.
Private or public sector..stuff like this shouldn't be allowed against normal Joe who puts in 30 years only to end up with peanuts because his boss didn't keep the pension plan funded.


Judge: Detroit can use bankruptcy to confront debt
The decision set the stage for officials to confront $18 billion in debt with a plan that might pay creditors just pennies on the dollar and is sure to include touchy negotiations over the pensions of about 23,000 retirees and 9,000 workers. Orr says pension funds are short by $3.5 billion.

He also acknowledged that pensions would be a sensitive issue because they represent a "human dimension" to the crisis, with some retirees getting by on less than $20,000 a year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-03-2013, 03:09 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,222,338 times
Reputation: 17209
It does suck and something will probably happen to make sure they get it in the end with no lesson learned.

This is why I was happy when the company I work for changed their plan from a pension to a personally owned 401k. Now I just have to concern myself with the government taking it one way or the other to keep Wall Street rolling in money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2013, 03:13 PM
 
Location: Northeast
1,886 posts, read 2,226,945 times
Reputation: 3758
I feel sorry for them too, but the city was warned years ago if they didn't change policies etc, this would be the outcome.

I can pull up documentation to support this, but anyone informed knows this already. I BLAME the politicians who took no
action years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2013, 03:17 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,215,209 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by brienzi View Post
I feel sorry for them too, but the city was warned years ago if they didn't change policies etc, this would be the outcome.

I can pull up documentation to support this, but anyone informed knows this already. I BLAME the politicians who took no
action years ago.
Obviously the city was warned, but that has nothing to do with hurting the people that worked for and paid into their pension system with the expectation that they'd have a certain fixed income to live on.

Let's not be so heartless for crying out loud.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2013, 03:26 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,380,515 times
Reputation: 17261
The state of Michigan apparently has in their constitution that pensions are protected.....but apparently the federal bankruptcy overrides that.

But...given that the stat constitution forbids it, couldnt the retirees then sue the state that appointed someone to file federal bankruptcy? I suspect this will be a long story.

The other human dimension is that a lot of city workers are exempt from social security-because of the pensions they get. So if they lose the pensions, some of them will be reduced from a income of 60K/yr for example.....to $710 a month. Yeah thats the worst case scenario....but...lets be honest. These people had a deal that their state constitution guaranteed them wouldn't be modified. Then the state went and asked the feds to modify it. To me...thats not right.

On the other hand you read what the pension plan did...and it blows your mind.

Any year in which the pensions income outdid the target, the overage was paid to people invested in the 401a plan....problem with that, the targets an average....yeah they didn't get anything when it was below target....but the pension balance sheet dropped...and during the overages...the pension balance sheet didn't improve.....thats a problem.

So definitely some mismanagement there. And some pensioners truly benefited from it. But...it was part of the deal-that was constitutionally guaranteed by the state.

Should be interesting to watch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2013, 03:26 PM
 
Location: San Diego
50,322 posts, read 47,069,940 times
Reputation: 34089
Quote:
Originally Posted by brienzi View Post
I feel sorry for them too, but the city was warned years ago if they didn't change policies etc, this would be the outcome.

I can pull up documentation to support this, but anyone informed knows this already. I BLAME the politicians who took no
action years ago.

A good friend of mine I hung out with NEVER missed a chance to tell everyone how he was going to retire early with 100% of his pay. How we were going to still be workin for the man and he was going to be fishing every day. This went on for years until it started to hit the fan. Now he's shifted to "Give me back my pension". I told him time and again if it sounds to good to be true........

He could have bailed out at any time but he was positive he had it figured out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2013, 03:26 PM
 
8,483 posts, read 6,935,208 times
Reputation: 1119
People need to look at the Detroit accounting, all of it. This is the same thing they did to pensioners in the 80's and 90's in the so-called "private" sector. Govt employees everywhere counting on those cushy retirement pensions would do well to pay attention.

This woman has studied the phenom well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2013, 03:27 PM
 
Location: Northeast
1,886 posts, read 2,226,945 times
Reputation: 3758
I'm not being heartless as I'm a blue collar guy, i feel for those folks. It's the politicians who are to blame for this mess..

How does the politicians being warned with stat's and not taking action have nothing to do with this. They have everything to do with this...I feel for the common worker, I'm one myself...
At this point, it is what it is..Maybe Obama will step up and make things right, IDT so! ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2013, 03:34 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,215,209 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
It does suck and something will probably happen to make sure they get it in the end with no lesson learned.

This is why I was happy when the company I work for changed their plan from a pension to a personally owned 401k. Now I just have to concern myself with the government taking it one way or the other to keep Wall Street rolling in money.
LOL...you were HAPPY to lose your pension in lieu of a 401k?

That's a first. I'd prefer to have both, not to mention that this was the intent of the 401k anyway...to be no more than a part of your retirement.

I have a 401k myself, but I sure as hell wouldn't be buying a set of pompoms with tears of joy if I'd had my pension replaced with one. That doesn't make sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2013, 03:41 PM
 
8,483 posts, read 6,935,208 times
Reputation: 1119
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
The state of Michigan apparently has in their constitution that pensions are protected.....but apparently the federal bankruptcy overrides that.

But...given that the stat constitution forbids it, couldnt the retirees then sue the state that appointed someone to file federal bankruptcy? I suspect this will be a long story.

The other human dimension is that a lot of city workers are exempt from social security-because of the pensions they get. So if they lose the pensions, some of them will be reduced from a income of 60K/yr for example.....to $710 a month. Yeah thats the worst case scenario....but...lets be honest. These people had a deal that their state constitution guaranteed them wouldn't be modified. Then the state went and asked the feds to modify it. To me...thats not right.

On the other hand you read what the pension plan did...and it blows your mind.

Any year in which the pensions income outdid the target, the overage was paid to people invested in the 401a plan....problem with that, the targets an average....yeah they didn't get anything when it was below target....but the pension balance sheet dropped...and during the overages...the pension balance sheet didn't improve.....thats a problem.

So definitely some mismanagement there. And some pensioners truly benefited from it. But...it was part of the deal-that was constitutionally guaranteed by the state.

Should be interesting to watch.
People really need to go study the creative accounting of govt and seriously follow that money, fully documented.

Detroit: The Latest Bankruptcy Lie
quote:
Detroit is not bankrupt. It has created the illusion of bankruptcy by such common financial trickery as pension pre-funding – where future debt payments must be paid in advance so that government can invest that taxpayer money instead of using it to fix up the broken City.

I have every sympathy for those suffering, but...
quote:
So the City Of Detroit is covering up more than $8 billion dollars in CURRENT assets by its creative accounting of future assets due more than a year away that will be paid for by future assets that are creatively not reported in its own audited CAFR. If I was a resident of Detroit, I’d say it was time to hold certain lying councilmen and the mayor accountable to the people.


CA CAFR: $600 billion ‘pension investment’ fund nets just $1 billion

quote:
This means the state retains $600 billion in taxpayer assets for $1 billion in income. If California paid its debt and returned these assets, each of California’s 12 million households would receive $35,000, and pay a $83 tax to equal the $1 billion income of the state’s previous $600 billion fund. Or if we had universal health care, Californians would annually save between $10 and $30 billion
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top