Oh Brother, GLAAD Has a New Target - Duck Dynasty! (Georgia, kids)

[silas777]

Originally Posted by hammertime33

Really? So you think that if your state modified its driving laws tomorrow to ban heterosexual people from driving, allowing only homosexuals to do so, that such a law would pass constitutional muster?

Really?

[Georgianbelle]

Originally Posted by gtc08

A&E is not a one show network.

Nope, but this show is the money cow. It is the number cable show in the nation, and the merchandise from the show is sold everywhere.

[jaykibs]

Originally Posted by silas777

Really?

It's a legitimate question. Why not answer it?

[silas777]

Originally Posted by jaykibs

Correct, which is why it will be illegal to discriminate on those factors as well.

Do you think it should be illegal to marry your sister , mother , father?

[Rakin]

Originally Posted by hammertime33

Name me 6 such gays.

Mike, Jeff, Jay, Will, Sandy and Tom

[jaykibs]

Originally Posted by silas777

Do you think it should be illegal to marry your sister , mother , father?

There are biological reasons for that ban, and no one is pushing to remove it. So as it stands now, yes. Incest and sexual orientation are different, though.

[hammertime33]

Originally Posted by D-Towner

You believe in tyrany against anti-gay free speech because you don't want some gay people who could harm themselves to do so. The fact that you want to silence people is evidenced in your posts.

You clearly have no idea what free speech means. Free speech is our right under the 1st Amendment not to have our speech abridged by the government.

I fervently believe that anti-gay bigots have and should always have the right to spout their anti-gay hatred. I also fervently believe people who disagree with them have and should always have the right to speak against it - including calling for boycotts.

You're not happy with your life.

What a nasty personal attack.

[silas777]

Originally Posted by mensaguy

but there is something about the pursuit of happiness.

ooooh that is a good one! The courts will be full of cases based on the .."because it makes me happy" argument. We should be careful with that one.

[hammertime33]

Originally Posted by Rakin

Mike, Jeff, Jay, Will, Sandy and Tom

I take it that means you can't actually name one single gay person who wants ban this type of speech. Perhaps that's because we don't.

[D-Towner]

Originally Posted by hammertime33

You clearly have no idea what free speech means. Free speech is our right under the 1st Amendment not to have our speech abridged by the government.

I fervently believe that anti-gay bigots have and should always have the right to spout their anti-gay hatred. I also fervently believe people who disagree with them have and should always have the right to speak against it - including calling for boycotts.




What a nasty personal attack.

If you were happy, this wouldn't matter. Liberalism is based upon sadness. Perhaps you can become happy with yourself and stop buying into this liberal nonsense. Let's be honest, if you were happy with you're life, nothing this guy said would matter to you at all.