Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I never heard of Don Easterbrook. I told you exactly where the data originated - NASA. I cannot help it if you are too stupid to be able to distinguish fact from fiction.
Yeah sure.....That "we're heading into a 35 year cooling period" nonsense is pure Don Easterbrook.
Maybe you just picked it up from WattsUpWithThat? Don Easterbrook posts on that denialist conspiracy blog quite often.
However, I do not expect you to read it since that would spoil your imagined conspiracy theory.
NASA says nothing about heading into a 35 year cooling cycle (an idea which originated from Don Easterbrook). And those claimed 30-35 year cycles aren't supported by the data in that graph. Your cycle dates don't even match the data.
NASA says nothing about heading into a 35 year cooling cycle (an idea which originated from Don Easterbrook). And those claimed 30-35 year cycles aren't supported by the data in that graph. Your cycle dates don't even match the data.
Since we have already establishedthat you are incapable of comprehending what you read, it is not surprising that you would deliberately lie to cover up what must be a terribly embarrassing disability.
Since we have already establishedthat you are incapable of comprehending what you read, it is not surprising that you would deliberately lie to cover up what must be a terribly embarrassing disability.
Your childish ad hominens don't change the fact that you didn't get the idea that we are supposedly "heading into a 35 year cooling cycle" from NASA or from the NASA data. It's a claim that originated with Don Easterbrook.
A denialist blog like this is more likely the source of your claim:
They just go from one unlikely extreme to another, with no factual information to support any of their wild claims.
Yet you're the one claiming that "we're heading into a 35 year cooling cycle" with no factual information to support your wild claim. Or should I say, Don Easterbrook's wild claim that you are blindly parroting.
The Maunder Minimum lasted for 70 years in the late 1600's and early 1700's.
None of the AGW proponents know anything about the sun.
Obviously neither does NASA. Just 8 years ago NASA was predicting that this past solar maximum (which peaked May 2013) would be the biggest in almost 400 years. Boy, did they ever get that wrong.
One relatively quiet solar cycle is not going to have a long term impact. This is just more fear-mongering hyperbole by NASA. They like to do this sort of thing apparently. For example, in 2006 they were predicting the worst solar cycle since records were kept for almost 400 years.
"Solar cycle 24, due to peak in 2010 or 2011 'looks like its going to be one of the most intense cycles since record-keeping began almost 400 years ago,' says solar physicist David Hathaway of the Marshall Space Flight Center." --- Scientists Predict Big Solar Cycle - NASA Science
They just go from one unlikely extreme to another, with no factual information to support any of their wild claims.
Overall, from 1880 to 2010 there was a grand total increase in temperature of 0.80°C and a grand total decrease in temperature of 0.29°C. Resulting in a net temperature increase of 0.51°C.
From 1880 to 1915 the planet experienced a 35-year cooling cycle.
From 1915 to 1945 the planet experienced a 30-year warming cycle.
From 1945 to 1980 the planet experienced a 35-year cooling cycle.
From 1980 to 2010 the planet experienced a 30-year warming cycle.
Therefore, if the trend holds true, then we can expect another 35-year cooling cycle from 2010 to 2045. For the next 35 years temperatures should increase by a grand total of 0.20°C and decrease by a grand total of 0.145°C, leaving a net increase in temperature by 2045 of 0.055°C.
then why worry about global warming such as the global warming wackos would like us to believe. after all if the temp only goes up a few degrees, then who really cares....except for the liberals that want government to tax the people more to further their pet projects.
give the global warming people their little ice age, drop the temps 10-20 degrees and watch them crying for more global warming.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
