Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No one is arguing if it was ok or not...because it is irrelevant to the discussion today. At least try to keep your train on the right tracks...
Impeachment for perjury and obstruction of justice is never irrelevant - ever. Hillary is tainted by association. Rand did nothing wrong to point that out.
What happened with Bill Clinton was a historic milestone that did set women back. At that point it became socially acceptable for husbands to cheat on their wives. That is a mark of a male dominant society.We went from a culture of equal gender roles to male dominance because of Bill Clinton.
The only war being waged on women is the one put up by Dems. They want their women stupid and dependent. I would be furious at being treated that way if I were a D.
Excellent. Do keep on making remarks like that. You will drive women into the arms of the opposition party.
Is that what you thought when you were, oh, let me think............babbling about Romney's dog? And other amazing and amusing things? How about W drinking in college?
I can think of a zillion examples, and guess what! Huck isn't even running for office.
Both Romney and W were running for office when those events were raised in the media. (Not that the dog thing was really a worthy thing anyway.)
Point is, Bill Clinton is not running for office either. Hillary is not yet running for office.
When Laura Bush's vehicular manslaughter was brought up in 2000, Republicans were outraged--attacking spouses and families of candidates is not fair game. I believe Romney was actually running for office--so of course his history arose. So did Obama's and Al Gore's. Is it ok to attack the spouse of a candidate as long as the spouse is male?
In trying to come to the aid of Mike Huckbee's recent comments, Sen Paul reiterates that it is the Democrats that have a problem with women. Sen. Paul climbed into the "Way back Machine" to run over former President Bill Clinton for "predatory behavior".
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 18 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,552 posts, read 16,531,868 times
Reputation: 6031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockside
Extremely aggressive? What video were you watching? And don't you find it fascinating that our ex sex-offendor-in-chief has a 70% approval rating? You folks yearn for something that never existed.
Monica was 20 years old, how was Bill a Sex offender ? and personal approval ratings are usually based more so on job approval than it is on your actual opinion of their personal life.
Rand Paul basically said that the fact that Hillary Clinton is still married to Bill is a good enough reason not to vote for her, his entire point was to defend his wife's comment and he just made it worse.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
