The Positive Externalities of Carbon Dioxide (Canada, economic, elect, California)

[greywar]

Originally Posted by Volobjectitarian

So no actual argument against anything in the paper? Just dismissal based on who the author is? That's debate for you guys? Okie doke. Weaksauce, but okie doke.

I dont have the spare time to invest the large amount of time to try and disprove a paper thats 30 pages long written by someone who spends the majority of his professional life creating fallacies for cash.....over a argument on city data

[whogo]

Since no one can dispute the facts presented I will have to assume that global warming is a net positive.

[sanspeur]

The overall effects on agriculture will be negative if warming continues.... Climate Impacts on Agriculture and Food Supply | Climate Change | US EPA

The World Future Council: How climate change affects agriculture

Agriculture affected by global warming | Agriculture Goods

One recent Stanford University study found that increases in global production of maize and wheat since 1980 would have been about 5% higher were it not for climate change.

[greywar]

Thank you sanspeur for saving whogo.

Oh wait, now it will turn out that those studies don't matter.....

[Hyperthetic]

Originally Posted by whogo

Since no one can dispute the facts presented I will have to assume that global warming is a net positive.

It goes without argument.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by Volobjectitarian

Wasn't aware that "not generally accepted" was part of scientific method.

It's not.

It's part of the basis for determining whether or not an argument is an ad hominem.

Please, try to keep up.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by whogo

Since no one can dispute the facts presented I will have to assume that global warming is a net positive.

That would be pretty stupid. But go ahead. Knock yourself out.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by Volobjectitarian

Wasn't aware that "not generally accepted" was part of scientific method. Relativity wasn't generally accepted when it was proposed. The Earth being a sphere wasn't generally accepted when it was proposed. The heliocentric model of the solar system was not generally accepted when first proposed.

Yeah, well, that's how pseudo-science cultists determine what they think is science now. It's a popularity contest, just like junior high.

[Hyperthetic]

Science is malleable.

Credibility finds its own equilibrium.

Global warming science has nothing.

Nothing!

"Intelligent Science" has more.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

Yeah, well, that's how pseudo-science cultists determine what they think is science now. It's a popularity contest, just like junior high.

You can always count on IC for jumping on the bandwagon that has no wheels.