Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Is incest inherently wrong/harmful?
No 13 9.70%
Yes 100 74.63%
Depends on the exact relationship between the two people 21 15.67%
Voters: 134. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-11-2014, 07:35 PM
 
2,096 posts, read 4,774,216 times
Reputation: 1272

Advertisements

Most of us find it disgusting and abhorrent, but is there really any objective, logical reason to make it a crime?
It's true that pairing between close relatives can lead to birth defect if children are created in the union, but by that logic we shouldn't allow people with inheritable diseases to reproduce either, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-11-2014, 07:41 PM
 
Location: Kansas
25,940 posts, read 22,094,372 times
Reputation: 26667
It is much more than the act involved in incest which I think the OP is trying to reduce incest to being. Yes, it is wrong because of all the dynamics involved both physical and psychological. And, the "yuck" factor is over-the-top. It is becoming a problem especially with those that get so drugged up that any warm body will do. Sad. Seriously, date outside the family tree for best results.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2014, 07:43 PM
 
874 posts, read 1,648,148 times
Reputation: 790
It sounds like you want to get naughty with your sister.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2014, 01:05 AM
 
Location: Dallas, Oregon & Sunsites Arizona
8,000 posts, read 17,329,443 times
Reputation: 2867
Dumb Question. Always wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2014, 01:11 AM
 
16,431 posts, read 22,191,140 times
Reputation: 9623
Yes, wrong. Just as homosexual acts are wrong. Wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2014, 02:36 AM
 
Location: Virginia-Shenandoah Valley
7,670 posts, read 14,236,981 times
Reputation: 7464
This should go well. I personally do not care if two far distant cousins want to do the bump but when first cousins and similar relatives want to get together that's whare I would draw the line. But what do I know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2014, 09:29 AM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,508 posts, read 26,288,860 times
Reputation: 13293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bideshi View Post
Yes, wrong. Just as homosexual acts are wrong. Wrong.
We don't live under the Bible. So, no.

Incest should be illegal. There are no exceptions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2014, 09:51 AM
 
Location: Volcano
12,969 posts, read 28,426,027 times
Reputation: 10759
Most people today are unfamiliar with the fact that marrying cousins was not only not forbidden in earlier times in the US, but was actually encouraged in many cases. It was seen as a way to 1) consolidate family property, and 2) encourage desireable personal characteristics to be bred into the children. Does that sound like breeding livestock? It was. And in the 1700s and 1800s it was quite common. There was a lot of matchmaking in those eras. To this day there are only a handful of states that forbid cousin marriages.

Incest between parent and child, or between siblings is a different matter, subject to societal taboos around the globe since time immemorial. I think that's due to two key factors... 1) it can lead to genetic tragedies, especially in allowing recessive genes to come forward in any offspring, and 2) it interferes with the normal power relationships between family members and can result in coercive and abusive situations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2014, 10:29 AM
 
8,402 posts, read 24,218,555 times
Reputation: 6822
Quote:
Originally Posted by annie_himself View Post
We don't live under the Bible. So, no.

Incest should be illegal. There are no exceptions.
Why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2014, 10:59 AM
 
Location: california
7,322 posts, read 6,920,840 times
Reputation: 9253
It has been proven time and time again the it causes birth defects, that in it'a self should be enough reason .
Selfish sex even if it's mutual , disregarding the potential disaster is wrong.
Say you are the product of this kind of event and cary significant birth defects, and knowing this is true and the people that caused this, what would you do/feel about them?
They are not loving, you are a mistake, due to their lust and selfish behavior.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top