Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
How many hearings has convicted criminal Issa conducted about Benghazi? Do you think the dems should have gone after the repubs for the 11 attacks on our diplomatic installations during Gomer`s 2 terms? Romney`s own words (the idiotic 47% comment) were his undoing.
The Thing about the 47% is painfully true. That is the reason for a revised Taxed system that is more fair to all, including the rich who pay the most taxes.
Issa is not so much looking to convict and send to prison. More over to find out what was the chain of command was doing. Why was the President miss represent in the first weeks of Benghazi what really went. Why Susan Rice lied.
All good questions that the administration has not answer , not the Sec. Clinton.
This has nothing to do with Obama or Holder, and it would not have changed the election. The topic of the thread is a flat out lie, and Obama has been in office for over 6 years. He won 2 election. He'll be gone soon and then you all can spend 8 more year making excuse and coming up with conspiracy theories about how and why Hilary won. Get over it already...
You mean like Democrats "got over" President Bush winning the 2000 electiin?
Is this supposed to somehow discredit Obama's five million vote victory over Mitt Romney?
Is this supposed to somehow discredit the five million dead and mentally ill liberal votes that gave Obama a victory over Mitt Romney? You're a racist! Dead liberals and liberals with mental disorders have the right to vote to!
Location: Anchorage Suburbanites and part time Willowbillies
1,708 posts, read 1,861,562 times
Reputation: 885
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier
You mean like Democrats "got over" President Bush winning the 2000 electiin?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoniDanko
No that's obviously is not what I was referring too, but yes, they have.
"But what if the recounts had gone forward, as Mr. Gore and his lawyers had demanded?
The consortium asked all 67 counties what standard they would have used and what ballots they would have manually recounted. Combining that information with the detailed ballot examination found that Mr. Bush would have won the election, by 493 votes if two of the three coders agreed on what was on the ballot; by 389 counting only those ballots on which all three agreed."
"But what if the recounts had gone forward, as Mr. Gore and his lawyers had demanded?
The consortium asked all 67 counties what standard they would have used and what ballots they would have manually recounted. Combining that information with the detailed ballot examination found that Mr. Bush would have won the election, by 493 votes if two of the three coders agreed on what was on the ballot; by 389 counting only those ballots on which all three agreed."
I didn't read the article because I'm really not that interested in starting a debate about something that happened over 14 years ago... No one cares or is still bringing up FL other than the Republicans in this thread.
Whether Bush would have won or not was not my point. My point is that what happened in the 2000 election was way more significant thus warranted the outrage much more so than the hand full of people that may have committed voting fraud. What happened in 2000 could have still arguably changed the election results being that the election was sooooo close. The amount of voting fraud would not have changed a thing, yet some Republicans continuously cite it as if it's the reason who Obama won. That's my only point.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.