Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
After November 2014, when (not if) Republicans take the Senate majority and continue to capitalize on the nationwide momentum that has been gaining steam in their favor since 2010, we can all expect to see Barack Obama playing more golf, going on more vacations, removing himself from hard battles, and refusing to bow to left wing extremists like the New York Times, Planned Parenthood, NARAL, FAIR, NAACP, Rainbow PUSH, illegal immigrants, HomoActivists, gun-grabbing groups,etc.
At that point, Eric Holder/Harry Reid/Nancy Pelosi will be muzzled and Democrats will be forced to run all talking points through the White House before appearing on the Sunday news shows.
This, of course, is just a thumbnail of the drastic change in practices that will take place when this President is faced with the threat of House impeachment. Afterall, a win for the GOP in the Senate means that America is sick and tired of the Democratic Agenda.
To stay the course would be to encourage (even dare) the House to impeach him. For a man so ensconced in his legacy, there's no way under the sun that the President of 2015/2016 will resemble anything like the law-defying President of today.
Nonsense. The Republicans aren't going to impeach or even TRY to impeach anyone. Gimme a break.
Do you realize how hard impeachment is to carry out? Even if Republicans had every seat in congress, they still ain't gonna try it.
Stop dreaming. You guys toss that impeachment word around so much that you've lost sight of how rare it is in American politics.
I don't. We need mainstream Republicans to take control back of their party, as in a 2 party system, one impotent one for the WH makes the other one able to go as far to the other extreme as they wish.
Agreed tho word was Clinton still had high popularity numbers then, Obama doesn't even now.
Obama's approval rating is not that low.
The fact is, Obama's lowest approval rating is higher than Clinton's lowest approval rating.
And in fact Obama's lowest approval rating is higher than the lowest approval rating of any President since Kennedy. Every president since Kennedy has (at some point in their Presidency) had a lower approval rating than Obama has EVER had.
Obama's lowest approval rating was 39%.
Compare that to GW Bush's 19%
Or to Clintons' 36%
Or to GHW Bush's 29%
Or to Reagan's 35%
Or to Carter's 28%
Or to Ford's 37%
Or to Nixon's 23%
Or to Johnson's 35%
You have to go back over 50 years to Kennedy's low point of 56% to find a President who didn't at some point get a lower approval rating than Obama's had.
Reagan spent essentially 2 full years (from Nov 81' to Nov 83') without gettting a single approval rating over 50%. Obama has never done that.
Last edited by LordBalfor; 04-16-2014 at 11:12 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
