Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The State Department plans to spend $400,000 in taxpayer dollars to purchase a camel statue for the new American embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan.
The sculpture by artist John Baldessari depicts a fiberglass camel staring into the eye of an oversized needle in play on a passage from the New Testament about the difficulty the wealthy have in entering heaven, BuzzFeed reported.
Oh, our government is just so poor. They are responsible with the money they get...they wouldn't waste the taxpayer's money. If you believe that...I have a bunch of money in Nigeria I need some help getting into this country.
I hope all of you that paid taxes this week...enjoy your new purchase.
These lying, irresponsible jackasses in both parties that treat the taxpayers like idiots and their money like crap, deserve to be strung up. Maybe the old tar-and-feather routine needs to be brought back in style.
The department came under scrutiny in December after commissioning a $1 million sculpture to be installed at new building at the American embassy in London in 2017. The purchase was defended as a "good use" of the agency's resources.
Last Year, The Washington Times reported that department spent about $180,000 on alcohol in September and $400,000 in all of 2012, three times the $118,000 spent in 2008.
Records obtained by the paper showed that alcohol spending went up at American diplomatic posts around the world. The purchases included nearly $16,000 for bourbon and whiskey in Moscow, and more than $22,000 for wine in Tokyo.
Obvious question is why aren't our government employees paying for their own damn booze?
Obvious question is why aren't our government employees paying for their own damn booze?
We need a clean sweep in D.C.! Far too many politicians and government employees think they are entitled to spend tax dollars - after all, isn't this money unlimited and at their disposal? It can't ever be used up because more keeps coming in all the time, so "let's party!"
I think they'd be a bit more careful if it was their own money they were spending.
Officials explained the decision to purchase the piece of art, titled “Camel Contemplating Needle,” in a four-page document justifying a “sole source” procurement. “This artist’s product is uniquely qualified,” the document explains. “Public art which will be presented in the new embassy should reflect the values of a predominantly Islamist country,” it says. (Like the Bible, the Qur’an uses the metaphor of a camel passing through the eye of a needle.)
Now, that brings up the question of why "officials" of the United States State Department are so willing to mix "church and state" over there on embassy property, but would be against doing that here at home. After all, we are a predominantly Judeo Christian country so why shouldn't "public art" reflect those values here on government property?
Plus, what message are they sending to Pakistan and Muslims, where the average annual income is $1200? Are they saying that it's better to be a poor Muslim because they'll get into heaven before a rich man would?
Besides violating the principle of mixing religion with official U.S. presence in the country on US property, they are also corrupting the message.
Where is the Atheists Against Religion group? Why aren't they protesting this expenditure of our money? After all, it's their money too.
Officials explained the decision to purchase the piece of art, titled “Camel Contemplating Needle,” in a four-page document justifying a “sole source” procurement. “This artist’s product is uniquely qualified,” the document explains. “Public art which will be presented in the new embassy should reflect the values of a predominantly Islamist country,” it says. (Like the Bible, the Qur’an uses the metaphor of a camel passing through the eye of a needle.)
Now, that brings up the question of why "officials" of the United States State Department are so willing to mix "church and state" over there on embassy property, but would be against doing that here at home.
What message are they sending to Pakistan and Muslims, where the average annual income is $1200?
Are they saying that it's better to be a poor Muslim because they'll get into heaven before a rich man would?
Besides violating the principle of mixing religion with official U.S. presence in the country, they are also corrupting the message.
Where is the Atheists Against Religion group? Why aren't they protesting this expenditure of our money?
After all, it's their money too.
Wonder who approved it.
I was going to go there, but decided see if anyone else would. Now...if we can't have crosses and the 10 commandments in federal buildings or on federal property, why can we have art celebrating Islam? This administration is an obscenity.
I was going to go there, but decided see if anyone else would. Now...if we can't have crosses and the 10 commandments in federal buildings or on federal property, why can we have art celebrating Islam? This administration is an obscenity.
Exactly. And let's remember that U.S. embassy property is technically United States government property.
I was going to go there, but decided see if anyone else would. Now...if we can't have crosses and the 10 commandments in federal buildings or on federal property, why can we have art celebrating Islam? This administration is an obscenity.
Stuff your outrage. Where were you when Bush War Inc was flying pallets of shrink-wrapped US dollars in C-17s to pass out to bandits in Iraq? To the tune of $1,000,000,000,000 (yes that's a TRILLION).
Nowhere to be seen, I bet.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.