Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Who decided that it was NOT okay for two men or two women to marry?
There are two obvious answers to that:
All of human history
God
Quote:
Originally Posted by TriMT7
And, characterization of a same sex relationship of "debauchery" is pretty much a bigoted thing to say.
So, God is a bigot?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TriMT7
Who knows. The dude hung around with a bunch of other dudes and apparently was a virgin his whole life, so maybe topics of sexuality wasn't his specialty.
Sure, why not? The way people like you portray God, he's already a sniveling, bipolar, jealous busy body prone to fitful rages, murderous inclinations and overly obsessed with rule making and sexual purity.... so if we're ascribing human characteristics to god, being a bigot is probably the least of his flaws.
I would be completely fine with Gay marriage if there was a way to 100% know for sure that both parties were born Gay. But there is no way to know for sure. It's a fact that some are Gay because of abuse and neglect as children. So to me, sanctioned homosexuality is nothing but a continuance of that abuse.
I would be completely fine with Gay marriage if there was a way to 100% know for sure that both parties were born Gay. But there is no way to know for sure. It's a fact that some are Gay because of abuse and neglect as children. So to me, sanctioned homosexuality is nothing but a continuance of that abuse.
W.T.F.
That's your thought process? Really?
Let's assume you are right. We will assume ONLY for the sake of argument, because it is NOT a "FACT" that some people are gay because of abuse and neglect as children. It's not. But let's assume you're correct to analyze your thought process:
A person becomes some way because of trauma, and your compassionate conservatism tells you that you should prevent them from being happy and marrying because that would be a "continuance of that abuse"?
But it's not bigoted to point out that polygamous marriages are unworkable under the current framework of marriage.
Sure it is, who are you to say that they are "unworkable" And who are you to define marriage for everyone else?
That counter argument sounds pretty familiar eh?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
