Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-24-2014, 02:21 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,692 posts, read 34,601,093 times
Reputation: 29291

Advertisements

props to brentwoodgirl, this deserves a thread of its own.

Quote:
In February 2012, the Human Rights Campaign posted on its web site National Organization for Marriage’s 2008 tax return and the names and contact information of the marriage group’s major donors, including soon-to-be Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney. That information then was published by the Huffington Post and other liberal-leaning news sites.
but wait, there's more!

Quote:
HRC’s president at the time, Joe Solmonese, was tapped that same month as a national co-chairman of President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign.
IRS Admits Wrongdoing, to Pay $50,000 in Leaking of Marriage Group’s Tax Return
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-24-2014, 02:27 PM
 
5,064 posts, read 5,734,486 times
Reputation: 4775
Here's another link to a story with even more info:

Quote:
After the list was published, Joe Solmonese left his position as president of HRC to become national co-chairman of President Barack Obama's re-election campaign.

Someone at the IRS gave the confidential documents to Matthew Meisel, a gay rights activist, the lawsuit revealed through emails between Meisel and a colleague. When asked to testify, Meisel invoked his Fifth Amendment right to not incriminate himself and refused to reveal who at the IRS provided him with the documents.
IRS to Pay $50,000 to National Organization for Marriage for Leaking Confidential Information to Human Rights Campaign

The same DOJ who is refusing to pursue this proven case of illegal IRS activity is supposedly "investigating" the IRS targeting of conservatives.

Last edited by CaseyB; 06-24-2014 at 04:37 PM.. Reason: off topic
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2014, 03:25 PM
 
Location: Spokane, WA
1,989 posts, read 2,537,964 times
Reputation: 2363
What a fake scandal.

You racist homophobes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2014, 03:27 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,256,917 times
Reputation: 17209
This is why the (R)'s need to quit having hearings and get this into the courts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2014, 03:29 PM
 
4,130 posts, read 4,464,526 times
Reputation: 3046
Wait, I thought the IRS only targeted conservatives based on Obama's orders.

Were the people who made those claims lying?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2014, 03:29 PM
 
26,536 posts, read 15,102,432 times
Reputation: 14681
I have supported gay marriage since I was a college kid in the 1990s, which is a lot longer than Hillary or Obama (who changes on this issue as the wind changes).

But I am 100% opposed to the illegal leaking of tax data of this group, even though I am opposed to their idea. I am glad to see the IRS punished for this illegal act that infringes upon that groups legal rights. However, I would like to see an INDIVIDUAL within the IRS punished for leaking the data.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2014, 03:31 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,256,917 times
Reputation: 17209
It's sad though....

“Congress made the disclosure of confidential tax return information a serious matter for a reason,” NOM Chairman John D. Eastman told The Daily Signal. “We’re delighted that the IRS has now been held accountable for the illegal disclosure of our list of major donors from our tax return.”

The IRS has not been held accountable. Tax payers have been. Tax payers have to pay this. Someone instructed this information be released and that person should have been fired and prosecuted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2014, 03:32 PM
 
Location: Where they serve real ale.
7,242 posts, read 7,913,304 times
Reputation: 3497
The reality is we should copy the open records laws of countries like Sweden and Norway and make all tax documents public documents. There is no reason for them to be secret, they are official government documents, and the more transparency we have in our government the better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2014, 03:32 PM
 
45,612 posts, read 27,230,182 times
Reputation: 23912
$50,000 is not even a slap on the wrist. It's more like a stomach growl.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2014, 03:36 PM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,042,679 times
Reputation: 3603
Thats it? And isnt that actually our money? No one is fired? That should be jail time! What the hell!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:50 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top