Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wrong direction. Health care shouldnt have to be tied to employment.
And people wonder why there are fewer small businesses and are being chain stored to death.
Wrong direction. Health care shouldnt have to be tied to employment.
And people wonder why there are fewer small businesses and are being chain stored to death.
It doesn't force employers to insure. They can chooose the penalty. What this wisely does do is remove the tax favored status of just dumping them on the exchange. A status such employers do not deserve to be granted.
It doesn't force employers to insure. They can chooose the penalty. What this wisely does do is remove the tax favored status of just dumping them on the exchange. A status such employers do not deserve to be granted.
.
A penalty isnt force? More progressive word games.
It's a good ruling and is just another example of the lies right wing conservatives have told about the ACA being proven completely untrue. Not that facts or reality ever influences them in any way; many of them are still birthers and believe in mythical death panels.
It's a good ruling and is just another example of the lies right wing conservatives have told about the ACA being proven completely untrue. Not that facts or reality ever influences them in any way; many of them are still birthers and believe in mythical death panels.
Why in the ---- do you think employers need to pay that kind of fine?
It doesn't force employers to insure. They can chooose the penalty. What this wisely does do is remove the tax favored status of just dumping them on the exchange. A status such employers do not deserve to be granted.
.
Do you hear yourself talk? "It doesn't force employers to insure. They can choose the penalty."
Ridiculous. The entire point of a penalty is to prevent people from doing the thing which incurs that penalty. Is that a difficult concept?
"The health law, known as the Affordable Care Act, builds on the current system of employer-based health insurance. The administration, like many in Congress, wants employers to continue to provide coverage to workers and their families."
??? Not passing Obamacare would have helped many employers "continue to provide coverage to workers and their families."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
