Feinstein, Boxer advance gun seperation for the unstable

[rso092]

Originally Posted by MJJersey

Nj is trying to pass a law that allows police to come into your home, without a warrant, and take all your guns if a third party calls them and says they think you are mentally ill.

Sounds like a bad idea for the cops.

I'm sure there is still at least one person left in New Jersey willing to stand up to that type of tyranny.

[Mac_Muz]

LOL Only in California Law for the unstable by the unstable.

[Mac_Muz]

Originally Posted by antarez

I agree, instead California has been releasing the worst kind of prisoners early to reoffend and hospitals have been dumping patients.

These 2 issues deserve financing before foreign aid to places that hate America, such as Pakistan.

That is what Gov Dukakis (sp) did in Mass years ago. He released a prisoner for a weekend to commit murder That was Willy Horten. Willy used a knife but the Gov wrote new gun law anyway. Willy turned himself in first thing Monday morning as promised. The Duke should have been tried in a Court of Law

These poly tics have made a mockery of the LAW, and for it We the people need to be more armed now than any time ever in the past.

In 1991 the state of NY closed up shop on places for the insane and dumped them in the street. These tax paid building still stand rotting and molding and have not yet finished costing tax payers. The good Gov Como should have been arrested and tried in a court of LAW.

When these poly tics pass law to condemn guns and the people who own them, I for one plan to ignore their silly law.

If anything these poly tics have proven they are not qualified to lead, or make LAW.

I wonder what marie antoinette would say?

[Toyman at Jewel Lake]

The thing anyone with an IQ above that of a tomato realizes is a gun is only a tool, it is the person behind the gun that is the danger. And there are many other "tools" that are equally capable of slaughtering innocents in the hands of an unstable person.

Anyone with any sense would realize if a person is such a threat that they can not be trusted with a gun, that they are STILL A THREAT even if they can't legally buy a gun. You don't take guns away from them, you take them away from the guns..and cars, knives, bats, gasoline, matches, etc. If a person is that much of a threat they should be adjudicated so and put in a secure facility where then are not a threat to the public.

[Haakon]

Originally Posted by antarez

Feinstein, Boxer advance gun-separation idea for unstable - The Orange County Register

This is going to get some people upset, but as a Conservative I believe this is long overdue.

Instead of restrictive measures for law abiding gun owners in California you also have the following that can no longer legally possess weapons:

1. Former Law enforcement with convictions
2.Mentally unstable
3.People who used to be able to have guns that are no longer able to.

They have several of these individuals in databases and they know their status, these people should have to give up their arms as they are not legally entitled to own them anymore.

I can see where it might be an issue when these people live with others that keep guns they might have access to.
.

But this is sorely needed and lawful.

Any thoughts?

The devil is in the details. The sound bites always sound good, but somehow they end up with 1,000 pages of add ons, amendments and pork with a line buried somewhere that amounts to a all out ban, which is their real ultimate goal. And of course when Republicans vote against it, because it's a terrible 1,000 page law that has a popular sound bite Democrats howl that Republicans don't care about people.