Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 06-11-2014, 04:41 AM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,054,479 times
Reputation: 10270

Advertisements

We conservatives don't look at quotas. We look at the individual.

 
Old 06-11-2014, 04:42 AM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,054,479 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
The point isn't so much that a deliberate action was taken against Cantor, but rather that Cantor's lose underscores the fact that he was the only non-Christian Republican in the House of Representatives. With Cantor there, that couldn't be said. Now, with Cantor gone, the failing of the GOP is much more definitive.

But your point is well-taken: This one election isn't what makes the Republican Party Dominionist. It is Dominionist because of its composition and the manner in which the party has fostered Dominionism over the last generation.
Yea....we all got together and said "get the Jew!".
 
Old 06-11-2014, 05:13 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,558 posts, read 17,232,713 times
Reputation: 17599
You saying that if the rep party had a representative from one of the stated religions, that person would represent the same view shared by everyone else in that religious flavor.

You are saying all Jews, Muslims et al, think alike and it matters not which one gets the podium to express their views.

You are saying a non christian will have different legislative views than a christian as upposed to one christian having views different from another christian.

Are you saying the entire republican party, not just the elected representatives are exclusively christian?

So you expect your non-christian dem legislators to exert strong religious influence into their propsoed legislation and the bills they support? If not what does it matter what their religion is?

Well one rep candidate was rumored to be part of a religious minority and she was attacked by the dem opposition for her beliefs.

Mitt Romney was attacked for his religious affiliation with the Mormon church.

Apparently dems have a real problem with religious minorities. They make hypocracy one of their platforms planks and the insidious part is they aren't even aware of what they are doing, their eyes turn back in their head, thought ceases and they go into deep political rapture.
 
Old 06-11-2014, 05:40 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,384,037 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by GABESTA535 View Post
With the defeat of Eric Cantor, the only Jewish Republican House member, there will be no non-Christian Republican House members. Are members of minority religions or atheists welcome in the Republican Party? The Democratic House caucus has members of the Jewish Muslim Buddhist and Hindu faiths among their ranks. How can the Republican Party claim to be a national party when it only has fundamentalist Christians in their ranks?

Flipping the script are we?

Just because Democrats hate one specific group doesn't mean they love the rest.

Meanwhile, working Americans who believe in accountability are still looking for access to the system.
 
Old 06-11-2014, 05:49 AM
 
26,496 posts, read 15,079,792 times
Reputation: 14650
Quote:
Originally Posted by GABESTA535 View Post
With the defeat of Eric Cantor, the only Jewish Republican House member, there will be no non-Christian Republican House members. Are members of minority religions or atheists welcome in the Republican Party? The Democratic House caucus has members of the Jewish Muslim Buddhist and Hindu faiths among their ranks. How can the Republican Party claim to be a national party when it only has fundamentalist Christians in their ranks?
So you are arguing that Republicans should have voted to re-elect Cantor, because he is a Jew?
 
Old 06-11-2014, 05:59 AM
 
Location: Austin
15,637 posts, read 10,393,078 times
Reputation: 19541
Quote:
Originally Posted by GABESTA535 View Post
How can the Republican Party claim to be a national party when it only has fundamentalist Christians in their ranks?
Classic Republican dogmas such as limited government, personal property, the right to bear arms, and free market capitalism are important to people of no religion/atheists/agnostics, too. I'm one of them.
 
Old 06-11-2014, 06:01 AM
 
59,082 posts, read 27,318,346 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by GABESTA535 View Post
With the defeat of Eric Cantor, the only Jewish Republican House member, there will be no non-Christian Republican House members. Are members of minority religions or atheists welcome in the Republican Party? The Democratic House caucus has members of the Jewish Muslim Buddhist and Hindu faiths among their ranks. How can the Republican Party claim to be a national party when it only has fundamentalist Christians in their ranks?
Have you quit beating your wife yet?

Same type of question.
 
Old 06-11-2014, 06:04 AM
 
59,082 posts, read 27,318,346 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by GABESTA535 View Post
With the defeat of Eric Cantor, the only Jewish Republican House member, there will be no non-Christian Republican House members. Are members of minority religions or atheists welcome in the Republican Party? The Democratic House caucus has members of the Jewish Muslim Buddhist and Hindu faiths among their ranks. How can the Republican Party claim to be a national party when it only has fundamentalist Christians in their ranks?
Have you quit beating your wife yet?

Same type of question.

"How can the Republican Party....? PSST! The PARTY did NOT vote. The PEOPLE of 1 district voted.

Give 1 instance where the voters made his faith an issue.

Give ONE instance where the PARTY did what you claim.

Post fail.
 
Old 06-11-2014, 06:08 AM
 
26,496 posts, read 15,079,792 times
Reputation: 14650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
Have you quit beating your wife yet?

Same type of question.

"How can the Republican Party....? PSST! The PARTY did NOT vote. The PEOPLE of 1 district voted.

Give 1 instance where the voters made his faith an issue.

Give ONE instance where the PARTY did what you claim.

Post fail.
That is a good point.

I can only find examples of Democrats making his faith an issue post-election.

Democrats gain votes by dividing Americans into groups and then trying to win a majority of the groups. I believe this tactic hurts America.
 
Old 06-11-2014, 06:09 AM
 
59,082 posts, read 27,318,346 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kracer View Post
You saying that if the rep party had a representative from one of the stated religions, that person would represent the same view shared by everyone else in that religious flavor.

You are saying all Jews, Muslims et al, think alike and it matters not which one gets the podium to express their views.

You are saying a non christian will have different legislative views than a christian as upposed to one christian having views different from another christian.

Are you saying the entire republican party, not just the elected representatives are exclusively christian?

So you expect your non-christian dem legislators to exert strong religious influence into their propsoed legislation and the bills they support? If not what does it matter what their religion is?

Well one rep candidate was rumored to be part of a religious minority and she was attacked by the dem opposition for her beliefs.

Mitt Romney was attacked for his religious affiliation with the Mormon church.

Apparently dems have a real problem with religious minorities. They make hypocracy one of their platforms planks and the insidious part is they aren't even aware of what they are doing, their eyes turn back in their head, thought ceases and they go into deep political rapture.
"Mitt Romney was attacked for his religious affiliation with the Mormon church." AND ole harry reid, of the SAME religious affiliation, NEVER is.

Hypocrites much? I think so.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top