Quote:
Originally Posted by daylux
"Those ideals have often been threatened by an older, more traditional view of power. This alternative vision argues that ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs, that order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign."
I read that entire thing in context, and what I take from it is this. He's saying the founders believed that people should have a relationship with God, and freedoms are God-given, not government-given, and people can temper their own behavior through a personal relationship with a sovereign God.
In other words, he believes that way of thinking is backwards as he refers to it in a derogatory way. He believes in big government being sovereign, rather than a personal God.
|
Yeah, well at least government exists. And maybe that's the best thing you can say for it.
A "personal God" on the other hand.......