Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Lol... Wait, I'm confused... Did Obama topple Saddam and allow the nation to collapse in anarchy? Wow - that's pretty good, considering that the war began in 2003... mighty powerful of Obama to make that decision to invade without even being a national-level politician at the time!
Of course, then we have those on the far right who were angry that Obama wasn't pulling out of Iraqi fast enough, because the longer we stayed, the more money was wasted.
And, now, the same people are angry that he hasn't sent MORE troops there! Lol!
We get it - no matter what Obama does, it is "wrong," and nobody on the right is willing to admit to exactly WHY Iraqi has been a total disaster for close to a decade now. I'll give you a hint... ask Bush, Cheney, etc.
The Chemical Weapons Convention, which Iraq joined in 2009, requires it to dispose of the material at Al Muthanna, even though it was declared unusable and "does not pose a significant security risk"
"The Chemical Weapons Convention, which Iraq joined in 2009, requires it to dispose of the material at Al Muthanna, even though it was declared unusable and "does not pose a significant security risk"
Numerous bunkers, including eleven cruciform shaped bunkers were
exploited. Some of the bunkers were empty. Some of the bunkers contained large
quantities of unfilled chemical munitions, conventional munitions, one-ton
shipping containers, old disabled production equipment (presumed disabled
under UNSCOM supervision), and other hazardous industrial chemicals.
Lol... Wait, I'm confused... Did Obama topple Saddam and allow the nation to collapse in anarchy? Wow - that's pretty good, considering that the war began in 2003... mighty powerful of Obama to make that decision to invade without even being a national-level politician at the time!
Of course, then we have those on the far right who were angry that Obama wasn't pulling out of Iraqi fast enough, because the longer we stayed, the more money was wasted.
And, now, the same people are angry that he hasn't sent MORE troops there! Lol!
We get it - no matter what Obama does, it is "wrong," and nobody on the right is willing to admit to exactly WHY Iraqi has been a total disaster for close to a decade now. I'll give you a hint... ask Bush, Cheney, etc.
We've been at war with Iraq since the 90's genius.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
