Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Obamas degree in Income Redistribution didnt include an economics course.
It also didn't include any courses in government, obviously. I'd say Carter is now the second worst President by miles. I've never seen the US in such a state of mindless chaos.
Proof that a Harvard educated Constitutional Lawyer with no real world experience has no business being in the business of government.
It also didn't include any courses in government, obviously. I'd say Carter is now the second worst President by miles. I've never seen the US in such a state of mindless chaos.
Proof that a Harvard educated Constitutional Lawyer with no real world experience has no business being in the business of government.
It also didn't include any courses in government, obviously. I'd say Carter is now the second worst President by miles. I've never seen the US in such a state of mindless chaos.
Proof that a Harvard educated Constitutional Lawyer with no real world experience has no business being in the business of government.
It's not even close.
BarackO The Whackoâ„¢ will have this as his legacy: More corrupt than Nixon, more inept than Carter.
I know Mr. President that your a radical socialist and have absolutely no clue how the business world works. However get this thru your thick socialist head any business that are not efficient and have a lot of waste can’t compete. And if you are completely inefficient and continue to be inefficient, you are also out of a job, which in government your not.â€
Obamas degree in Income Redistribution didnt include an economics course.
When republicans speak of income redistribution they mean "taxing the rich and then giving that money to the poor." But today in America billionaire CEO's have lower tax rates than single Americans who make $100,000 a year.
While single Americans who make $100,000 a year pay over 20% in federal taxes. And non-CEO's who make over $410,000 a year are paying well over 30% federal tax rates.
The real income redistribution is rich CEO's having lower tax rates than regular Americans, and at the same time republicans giving the rich handouts like this.
Obama tried to pass a law called the "Buffet Rule" that would make rich CEO's pay the same tax rates as regular Americans, but republicans in congress blocked him.
When republicans speak of income redistribution they mean "taxing the rich and then giving the money to the poor." But today in America billionaire CEO's have lower tax rates than single Americans who make $100,000 a year.
While single Americans who make $100,000 a year pay over 20% in federal taxes. And non-CEO's who make over $410,000 a year are paying well over 30% federal tax rates.
The real income redistribution is rich CEO's having lower tax rates than regular Americans, and at the same time republicans give the rich handouts like this.
Obama tried to pass a law called the "Buffet Rule" that would make rich CEO's pay the same tax rates as regular Americans, but republicans in congress blocked him.
Single Americans making $100,000 a year pay 21% federal tax rates.
Non-CEO's making,
$200,000- 25% federal tax rate.
$300,000- 28% federal tax rate.
$850,000- 35% federal tax rate.
Everyone uses the same tax codes.
It is the TYPE of income that makes a difference.
Buffet's income is from money that has been taxed when it was earned.
I am not going to try and explain this to you.
If you want to believe something so stupid......enjoy yourself.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.