Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What the HELL does anything that has been posted have to do with the well to do?
Perhaps you meant "well enough" instead of "well to do"?
How am I supposed to know if you get your idioms mixed up? I'm not a mind reader.
That's right. To a liberal, morals are for other people. Rules are for other people. For liberals, the ends justify ANY means, including those that violate all standards of morality and decency.
What the HELL does anything that has been posted have to do with the well to do?
Perhaps you meant "well enough" instead of "well to do"?
How am I supposed to know if you get your idioms mixed up? I'm not a mind reader.
Tell me, have you ever argued there is a dichotomy between believing in science and faith in God?
Yes, until I realized the argument is an inanity. Because we legislate and make moral prescriptions based on scientific findings only a handful of people can actually verify and/or test for themselves. Isn't that faith too?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.